Posted on 10/27/2012 9:51:28 AM PDT by Perdogg
(Note: With the President due to campaign in Nashua today, his answer to our Editorial Page Director Andrew Cline's question, if he has one, would no doubt be of great interest to New Hampshire voters.)
Every time President Obama is asked why the U.S. embassy in Libya was denied its multiple requests for extra security at the Benghazi consulate before Sept. 11, he changes the subject. No wonder, as yesterday it was reported that not only were previous requests for extra security denied, but three additional requests on the night of the attack also were denied.
(Excerpt) Read more at unionleader.com ...
“All presidents are the same. The only difference is who gets appointed to the Supreme Court”
No difference? Your ignorance is amazing, but very liberal in its emotional assumptions. Bush would have given the order to take action and not have gone to bed as Obama did.
Take a look at the NYT latest earnings which were reported last week.
You’re the fool.
It’s not often you run into someone who doesn’t understand capitalism on FR. Businesses exist to turn a profit, not to promote an agenda. The agenda is secondary.
To the others here:
Presidents differ on social issues. They all hire the same economic people, and almost without exception, they come from Goldman Sachs.
I hope Romney wins because of the social issues but as we learned under W, his economic policies and foreign policies run similarly to Obama.
Romney will follow suit, and I predict that Romney will be hated at FR if he wins, not as much as Obama, but if anyone thinks Romney will be popular here, they are in for a rude awakening.
Yes, I guess that's true: I just can't fathom how capitalism works unless a little troll like you can enlighten me. I've only worked in mergers and acquisitions for the past twenty years.
I couldn't help notice how you managed to avoid the substance of my comment about the fate of the New York Times. If you'd bothered, you might have come to the conclusion that Pinch Sulzberger would rather run a far left-wing paper than a profitable one. His rather unfortunate shareholders probably have.
History contains a few examples of people and businesses and countries that preferred a ruinous ideology or course of action to a wise and common-sense one, but those examples are probably not of much interest to such a font of wisdom as yourself.
You just stay put in your self-satisfied little troll bubble, and come out and bite us when the mood suits.
If you believe anyone would rather run a business by agenda than by profit, you are a total simpleton and despite your “credentials” know nothing about business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.