To: Travis McGee; SampleMan; Dusty Road; SJSAMPLE; familyop
From quoted retired Delta operator, "Jeff is correct (about lasing without air asset) but the only reason you would do that is to determine a specific grid for indirect fire which the SEAL did not have available. You are in an active firefight against mortars and MGs; there is only one reason to cease returning fire and paint a target and it ain't because you thought it was a good time to pull a PMCS on your fucking GLD."Update #5 aside (at Blackfive), this quote is on the money. Something was on overwatch at that point in time that the SEAL on the ground either knew, or thought, was armed and capable of putting fire on the bad guys.
I'm not buying any other explanation. And, a 'no-go' decision was made to let these people die.
"Old Boy" message traffic about this is hot, heavy and getting mean.
309 posted on
10/28/2012 4:57:44 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus sum -- "The Taliban is inside the building")
To: Tainan
"Old Boy" message traffic about this is hot, heavy and getting mean. What is "old boy" message traffic?
310 posted on
10/28/2012 4:59:08 PM PDT by
The_Media_never_lie
(Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
To: Tainan
After reading the article, it does appear that the chain of command could have been overly stretched for that mission.
321 posted on
10/28/2012 6:11:31 PM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson