Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene
The article source that contradicts Petraeus is unnamed.

You mean the sources who were on the ground in Benghazi"? Do you doubt them?

You mean an unnamed source who was supposidly on the ground in Benghazi?

If one doubts information from an unnamed source then it stands to reason that one would doubt such an unnamed source was "on the ground" at such-and-such a location.

About the spcific contradiction between Petraeus and this unnamed source, it's worth noting that the unnamed source refers to the CIA chain of command which would include people outside the CIA, while Petraeus only refers to people inside the CIA.

259 posted on 10/26/2012 8:50:45 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign
You mean an unnamed source who was supposidly on the ground in Benghazi?

If one doubts information from an unnamed source then it stands to reason that one would doubt such an unnamed source was "on the ground" at such-and-such a location.


So you doubt the whole article by Jennifer Rubin? You doubt all the assertions she made?
260 posted on 10/26/2012 8:57:58 PM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson