Posted on 10/25/2012 8:02:57 PM PDT by redtetrahedron
BOSTON, October 24, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – As a young Mormon bishop, Mitt Romney made a passionate attempt to stop a woman from aborting her child.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
You just don’t seem to post anything related to real life and political topics or even reality, do you?
(Suggestion: Don’t take up crystal ball gazing as an occupation; it won’t yield either $ or accurate gazes)
(Voting for Virgil Goode)...
(So that makes you 0-for-WHAT on this thread???)
I think the "W" in your name must stand for "Wonder"...as in Hitless Wonder...
“I am pretty confident that no instances will emerge of Obama ever trying to prevent an abortion...”
As a matter of fact, Obama wants them left to die if they survive the abortion. The Kenyan disgusts me.
Certainly, the Democrat-controlled “legislature was counting on a Democrat governor to succeed Romney to put the real regulatory thumb screws in place.” Romney was certainly aware that the next Republican Governor candidate would be very unlikely to win, since one reason he chose not to seek re-election was his own weak standing in the polls. (In any case, his hand-picked Lt. Governor and 2006 Republican Governor candidate, Kerry Healey, was proudly pro-abortion. She would have had no problem with this evolution of RomneyCare
From MassResistance: To our knowledge, the Romney administration made no effort at all to exclude abortion from the benefits. Gov. Romney's universal health care program for Massachusetts includes taxpayer-funded abortions
If YOU knew abortion was coming down the pike via the portal of legislation YOU put in, what part of "NO EFFORT" don't you understand???
Since when is "no effort" vs. the threats upon the pre-born now considered "pro-life" activity???
Oh, ya mean vs. MA Law (chapter 112, section 12p) -- Abortion performed pursuant to Sec. 12M; preservation of life and health of child Section 12P reads:
If an abortion is performed pursuant to section twelve M, the physician performing the abortion shall take all reasonable steps, both during and subsequent to the abortion, in keeping with good medical practice, consistent with the procedure being used, to preserve the life and health of the aborted child. Such steps shall include the presence of life-supporting equipment, as defined by the department of public health, in the room where the abortion is to be performed.
IoW, in case the "death team" failed in its mission to kill the pre-born child; the "life time" needs to rush in for a rescue...
My, how "pro-life" of Massachusetts ...
So, which is worse...an out-and-out baby murderer, or a schizophrenic baby murderer who occasionally changes his mind & opts to rescue a dying victim???
(And Ann Romney followed up with a donation to Planned Parenthood)...
While Mitt followed up by being on the board for Marriott for a good chunk of the 90s and 2000s...with Marriott eventually also giving $ to Planned Parenthood, making Life Decisions International's boycott list.
Y'all doin' OK??
Buck up. Ya think it's bad now, wait till Mitt is elected and ya won't be able t' get yer drivers license renewed without wearin' yer magic underwear....
>he supports abortion for incest, rape, life, AND the HEALTH of the mother
As would anyone who has any chance of being elected to a high office.
Bullseye, P-M. A white, teenage, urban, middle class daughter of liberals is unexpectedly prego with the child of a foreigner black man.
What will the decision be?
The only question is: saline, evacuation, or dismemberment
As soon as I saw the headline... I was absolutely certain the people here doing their very best to keep Obama in office would hyjack this thread as usual. It is very sad...
The ABR’s can all bite me and F off.
These Freepers call themselves "moral absolutists" and have their own pinglist as you probably know.
They call the rest of FR "baby killers" and for a while that was hurtful to me but now that I consider the source, I don't get worked up about it any more.
Of course, the 99.999% of babies who are killed every year while waiting for the perfect pro-life candidate are an issue, but I guess the boost to the self-image of the "moral absolutists" outweighs that, big time.
I can’t verbalize how pathetic the Democrats are for trying to make this out to be a Romney ‘character flaw’..
GREAT COMMENT!
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm trying to not pay attention to the polls that say this election is close. Instead, I've been thinking about the recent articles about how desperate obama and the Rats are evidenced by their emphasis on abortion and pretending to have an agenda. I think people are seeing the real obama and it may end up a big win for Romney.
Hope like it’s a done deal; work like it’s dead even.
THANK YOU. I’ve only been thinking exactly that for the entire election cycle.
The problem is that politics is a game of results, not intentions. We must fix our eyes on the option that will result in the fewest unborn being slaughtered, even if it means voting for an imperfect candidate. To do nothing out of ‘moral principle’ and allow this slaughter to happen is nothing more than to kill innocents while claiming to be doing so in God’s name.
Certain Freepers may counter that voting for Romney does nothing more than advance the pro-abortion agenda, but seriously? Letting Obama in to fund and kill any more DOESN’T? As if political candidates were the only deciders on abortion?
I could go on about this, but I need to think of my blood pressure...
I think you must not understand the difference between Life of the mother and the mile-wide loophole of “Health”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.