[Wyrd bið ful aræd]

Virgil Goode is polling at 3-4% in Nevada. He's polling a couple of points in New Hampshire and Virginia as well.

Obama leads Romney by 3% in Nevada, and and New Hampshire and Virginia are close as well. At the end of the day, is it worth it to throw away your vote on Virgil Goode, the democrat turned republican turned constitution party candidate?

If Obama wins a slew of swing states (and then the election) by the skin of his teeth due to enough people wasting their votes on Virgil Goode, how will you feel? Will you feel satisfied? Smug? What is driving this need to vote for a nonstarter, and possibly throw away the election to the worst, most marxist man to ever hold the office?

[Colofornian]

Virgil Goode is polling at 3-4% in Nevada. He's polling a couple of points in New Hampshire and Virginia as well. Obama leads Romney by 3% in Nevada, and and New Hampshire and Virginia are close as well. At the end of the day, is it worth it to throw away your vote on Virgil Goode, the democrat turned republican turned constitution party candidate?

Romney is double-digits behind Obama in over a dozen states. Have you asked conservatives in those states: "At the end of the day, is it worth it to throw away your vote on Mitt Romney, the liberal pro-abort socialist healthcare pioneer turned 'moderate'?"

(Until you start asking conservatives in those given states, you don't deserve more of a response than that)

[Colofornian]

What is driving this need to vote for a nonstarter...

Electorally...Mitt Romney is a "nonstarter" in up to 15 states + D.C.

So I take it your advice to us is: If you live in one of those clear blue states, don't vote for either liberal (Obama or Romney)...given Romney is a nonstarter in those given states...