The Boston Globe was told that the testimony has far more than merely “valuing a business”. They heard that Romney backs Sternberg’s character, in the face of accusations of spousal battery by the ex-wife. She clearly told Allred this, or else Gloria would not have made the trip to Boston. The romney folks should not be so quick to not object. They should simply stay out of it, and let Mr. Sternberg’s lawyers strenuously object, as they are.
The romney folks should not be so quick to not object. They should simply stay out of it, and let Mr. Sternberg’s lawyers strenuously object, as they are.
This is ultimately NOT going to be about the documents. It’s going to be about the gag order. It’s going to be about allowing this woman to run to Oprah to tell “the rest of her story”, and about the Romney campaign having to deal with whatever lies she presents as new information. She will be able to say anything she wants, and there are plenty of stupid people who will believe her.
LOL. I wonder if the ex-wife lied to Allred to gin up publicity over her vendetta against ex-hubby and maybe re-open the case. One shark eating another. That would be delicious.
They are..this is a cosmetic statement..
The trouble with this theory is that if Romeny also acted as a fact witness as to ex-hubby's character it would kill his credibility as an objective expert on the issue of valuation. The two areas are at odds with each other and no competent attorney would use a single witness in this fashion.
Seems to me that Romney could attest to someone’s business character while meaning absolutely nothing about their private behavior which they wouldn’t necessarily know anything about.
The chilling thing is that you are probably right, but also that Alred is targeting young, unmarried female undecided voters, and apparently Alred believes a large percentage of them to have been abused.