Here is the problem with that: The amount of shares awarded in the divorce benefited from a low valuation. The lower the value, the more shares awarded in order to reach the $1m amount the judge targeted. Had Romney stated that, at the time, the shares were worth $10.00, then she would have only been awarded 100,000 shares instead of the 500,000 she got. Their premise and reality are diametrically opposed. If anything, Romney's testimony helped her.
Now, either Allred and the greedy ex are far too ignorant to realize this or their motivation is not money and strictly an attempt to smear Mitt. Both are blatantly apparent.
Allred’s goal may be to simply dominate a news cycle or two and keep Obama out of the headlines for the Benghazi fiasco. That’s the real story of the day, the emails prove that Obama knew on 9/11 that it was a terrorist attack by an Al Qaeda related group and he just turned out the lights and went to bed.