Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/22/2012 5:10:36 AM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Josephat

What does the U.S. gain from this? Democrats always punish our friends and reward our enemies.


36 posted on 10/22/2012 6:23:49 AM PDT by popdonnelly (The first priority is get Obama out of the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat
Dick Morris was on Fox News yesterday saying something along these lines was coming down the pipe.

But his angle was that the announcement would break in favor of Obama because the Iranians would agree to some kind of major limitation on their nuclear program in exchange for recognization of the program.

What's interesting here is that the Iranians seem to be trumpeting the recognition part but not saying anything about the limitation part. Maybe that will come out later.

By downplaying the limitations, and given the timing, the Iranians seem to want to hurt Obama, not help him. At first blush that seems odd — you'd think they'd prefer a pushover Democrat over a toughminded Republican in the White House — except that they did the same thing to Carter. They withheld the release of the hostages in order to insure Carter's defeat. This despite the fact that Carter was a fan of Khomeini and had helped undermine the Shah. Maybe the Iranians can't help but indulge in the short term satisfaction of unseating an American president even at the expense of longer term advantages.

And even then you have to ask, what advantages did they ever lose under Republican presidents? Were they worse off under Reagan than they would have been under Carter? Maybe they see Republicans as toothless tigers. In fact, maybe they accept Obama's talking point about his ability to rally international support for his actions against Iran (sanctions) as compared to an “isolated” Republican’s. Maybe they see this as all upside.

‘Course this is all sort of speculative without seeing more sourcing for this development.

38 posted on 10/22/2012 6:31:38 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

If this is true, Obama should officially be toast. All his antics that were supposedly intended to keep Iran from going nuclear were just stalling. Obama is a foreign enemy combatant occupying our White House, and his intention is to see the Islamists overrun the entire world - destroying the US and Israel and instituting worldwide sharia - just as he told the Egyptian ambassador privately in January of 2010.


43 posted on 10/22/2012 6:45:24 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

Obama is a cyst on the hemorrhoids of mankind.


45 posted on 10/22/2012 6:48:44 AM PDT by moovova (I work well with others, as long as they leave me alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat; sickoflibs

evidently they need mittens for prez so that they can have a reason to nuke Israel ???


54 posted on 10/22/2012 7:15:52 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

Let’s see that “secret proposal,” Pres. Obama. We thought you were waiting until after the election to sell us out to Russia, Iran, the Muslim countries etc. etc.


55 posted on 10/22/2012 7:17:20 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

Baraq Hussein Ubama recognizes the Islamists’ right to bear arms against Da Jooz.


59 posted on 10/22/2012 7:26:39 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat
If this is true, I believe it will not sit well with the electorate.

Reason: Iran has been demonized since the Carter days and rightfully so. That is not something to easily overcome no matter what the demographic. It will not sway the independents, although it may encourage Bambi's peacenik Code Pink brain-washed ignorant student commie hippy types. However, as often reported, the glow (enthusiasm) is no longer there for their Savior!

IT'S THE ECONOMY, STUPID!

60 posted on 10/22/2012 7:35:14 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

And Obama will have more flexibility AFTER the election...


62 posted on 10/22/2012 8:07:16 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

A nation with a religion that accepts and/or promotes suicide for their God must NOT be allowed nuclear weapons. It’s as simple as that!


66 posted on 10/22/2012 8:36:42 AM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

I think that in some circles it’s called “flexibility”.


68 posted on 10/22/2012 8:49:33 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Josephat

Valerie Jarrett was born in Iran to American parents.


73 posted on 10/22/2012 12:51:48 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson