Skip to comments.
Crowley’s Interference Saved Obama From Another Shellacking
Jewish Press ^
| October 18th, 2012
| Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Posted on 10/18/2012 5:51:21 PM PDT by Olog-hai
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: Olog-hai
Gee, I wonder why CNN’s ratings have fallen off the map. /sarc
41
posted on
10/18/2012 7:51:00 PM PDT
by
mykroar
(October race/religious riots bring November martial law. Voting postponed for your safety.)
To: Olog-hai
From Fox at least, for one of them. Of course, with Ailes’ “course correction”, they might be left of center . . . What about this? Is this related to Murdoch's trial?
To: Olog-hai
From Fox at least, for one of them. Of course, with Ailes’ “course correction”, they might be left of center . . . What about this? Is this related to Murdoch's trial?
To: lentulusgracchus
I don’t think the phone hacking thing is related.
44
posted on
10/18/2012 8:04:18 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
” - - - Crowley loudly validated President Barack Obama’s version of reality – and contradicted Governor Mitt Romney’s recollection of actual reality - - - “
Candy Crowley, proud member of CLAM, Censoring Liberal Agenda Media.
Crowley proves that NO member of ANY Media should ever be a Moderator again.
Get a History Professor to be the Moderator, or have no Moderator at all.
45
posted on
10/18/2012 8:04:20 PM PDT
by
Graewoulf
((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
To: lentulusgracchus; Sidebar Moderator
Sorry for the double-post .... I'm getting repeated "server is not responding" popups from my browser, as if FR were being DDoS'ed. It now appears backing up and trying the post again is not the answer.
Could you please remove the redundant post?
To: Graewoulf
How many history professors are themselves not left-leaning and into “revisionism” though . . . ?
47
posted on
10/18/2012 8:06:16 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: GOPJ
Well, you’ve got admit, hiding behind either one gives damned good cover. Him and his bus.
48
posted on
10/18/2012 8:06:21 PM PDT
by
katana
(Just my opinions)
To: Olog-hai
She did Bobo no favors, as her Benghazi bias ate up the next morning’s news cycle...
49
posted on
10/18/2012 8:15:52 PM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NV = 287EV)
To: Olog-hai
Fair point.
How about Professor Larry Sabato at NC, and appears on Fox from time to time as a political expert?
50
posted on
10/18/2012 8:32:31 PM PDT
by
Graewoulf
((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
To: Irenic
I hope I didn’t come across as a chit.No, not at all. I was just clarifying that my comment was aimed at the popular notion and not your comment in particular.
Perhaps an economic expert for debates on economic policy and so forth. I'm drawing a blank on names myself.
51
posted on
10/18/2012 8:36:26 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: manc
If we win this then this will be one of the greatest victorys in history And it will, without a doubt, be by the grace of Almighty God, who took great pity upon our wayward, undeserving souls.
52
posted on
10/18/2012 9:08:16 PM PDT
by
Bellflower
(The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
To: Olog-hai
With all the blow back from Crowley’s behavior, I think it helps Romney much more than if she kept her mouth shut.
To: Olog-hai
Crowley’s Interference Saved Obama From Another Shellacking.......until next Monday......
To: sickoflibs
Did you notice how fast Crowley changed the subject when Romney brought up Fast and Furious???
55
posted on
10/19/2012 6:34:50 AM PDT
by
AuntB
(Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
To: AuntB; IronJack; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; Impy; stephenjohnbanker; ...
RE :”
Did you notice how fast Crowley changed the subject when Romney brought up Fast and Furious???” I found Crowley very annoying, no doubt or argument there.
But Mitt+CO agreed to these debates because they thought they needed them. If they felt they had the upper hand they would have demanded a Britt Hume, or at least Brett Baur. Now that would have been fun.
Not surprisingly yesterday a number over at the Dem channel were making fun of R whining about this debate, some the same ones who whined about the first debate. They concluded that this is an admission that Mittlost. Duhhh!
56
posted on
10/19/2012 6:44:41 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
To: katana
Well, you’ve got admit, hiding behind either one gives damned good cover. Him and his bus.LOL - good one katana...
57
posted on
10/19/2012 8:35:57 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: lentulusgracchus; Mr. Jeeves
Lou Dobbs, John Stossel, Mary Katharine Ham or Dr. Krauthammer (a registered Democrat, after all)
58
posted on
10/20/2012 1:17:55 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson