Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney vs. Obama and Crowley (Crowley and Obama previously coordinated the Obama answers)
washington post ^ | 10/17/2012 | By Jordan Sekulow, Anna Sekulow and Matthew Clark

Posted on 10/18/2012 3:41:47 AM PDT by tobyhill

The economy, abortion, and national security took center stage, but the moderator stole the show at Tuesday night’s presidential debate at Hofstra University. While liberals were racing to announce, “Obama is back,” the debate resulted in a firefight that clearly highlighted the contrasts between former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and President Obama. From their leadership styles, approach to governing, and national security strategies, to their domestic, foreign, and economic policies, the contrast could not be clearer.

Regardless of the questions, President Obama found a way to steer them to the issues he wanted to discuss even if the answer was blatantly off topic. He turned a question about equal pay for women into an opportunity to promote more government funding for the abortion industry.

Five times he touted Planned Parenthood. He equated more taxpayer funding for the abortion industry as “a pocketbook issue for women.” In addition to defending Planned Parenthood funding in his response to a question about pay equity, President Obama promoted more taxpayer funding for the abortion industry in response to questions about what he had done to earn someone’s vote and how Romney was different than George W. Bush.

,,,,

Candy Crowley, CNN’s chief political correspondent and the first woman chosen to host a presidential debate in two decades, was given the unique opportunity to set the bar for aspiring female journalists. Instead, Crowley awkwardly went outside the boundaries, rudely interrupting the candidates when she saw fit, and conveniently making up the rules as she went along. In fact, it is estimated that she interrupted Romney 28 times while only interrupting Obama nine times.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012debates; candycrowley; corruption; crowley; democrats; fraud; obama; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: tentmaker
BINGO!
21 posted on 10/18/2012 4:20:48 AM PDT by tobyhill (Obamacare, the final nail in the US coffin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Why do you think that a journalist’s soul is worth that much? [rhetorical]


22 posted on 10/18/2012 4:24:05 AM PDT by Pecos (Double tap: the only acceptable gun control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Funny thing is, President Romney STILL won the debate. He faced what he’s gonna face in the next four years as President- a hostile media in collusion with a corrupt opposing party, and he came through with flying colors. As for his “not saying this” or “not saying that”- Bathhouse Barry and his Beard Crowley just served up the Libya scandal on a silver platter for the debate next Monday night. You can be sure that President Romney will stick a knife in the throat of Barry the Fairy.


23 posted on 10/18/2012 4:32:52 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Pray for Joe Biden- Proverbs 29:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PastorJimCM
I don’t like being lied to.

Conservatives hate being lied to, Regressives ("liberals") hate having the truth told to them.

24 posted on 10/18/2012 4:34:40 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Pray for Joe Biden- Proverbs 29:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
I agree that Romney came out ok but the American people deserve to know the truth, even through debate, without a Liberal Moderator hiding the truth.

Absolutely! What Crowley did should get her flamed by EVERYONE, not just the political right and a few liberals who understand the danger of what she did. Yet the same old "end justifies the means" crowd of fellow travelers praise her. Crowley was part of a crooked game... and for a guy who is continually hectoring others about "levelling the playing field" or whining about how "everyone needs to play by the rules," Barack Obama has no scruples about taking advantage of the marked cards that people like Crowley deal to him.

Mr. niteowl77

25 posted on 10/18/2012 4:38:08 AM PDT by niteowl77 (Getting stuck with other peoples' just desserts good and hard for over 50 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rocketmag

“Candy Crawley just happened to bring in the transcript from the Rose Garden”

I’m angry at Obama for saying that he called the attack terrorism the day after it happened. It’s such a provable lie. Did he think he’d get away with it?

Crawley needs to explain how she was able to yank that transcript off her desk within seconds of Obama’s assertion. She did, though, say that Romney was basically correct.


26 posted on 10/18/2012 4:43:04 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rocketmag
Candy Crawley just happened to bring in the transcript from the Rose Garden

And 0bama just happened to somehow know she had brought it.

27 posted on 10/18/2012 4:56:32 AM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

And every time Obama said “CANDY” she interrupted Romney on cue. The Benghazi gotcha, the staged theatrics, the selected questions all point to collusion, What we witnessed was possibly criminal. It was Chicago politics center stage and the corruption of the political process.

EVEN IF THE GOP CHOOSES TO NOT CALL IT OUT, THEY HAD BETTER BE AWARE OF IT AND ADJUST THEIR STRATEGY ACCORDINGLY.


28 posted on 10/18/2012 5:03:36 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77
for a guy who is continually hectoring others about "levelling the playing field" or whining about how "everyone needs to play by the rules," Barack Obama has no scruples

You just described the bad ending to every socialist/communist type of regime.

29 posted on 10/18/2012 5:05:20 AM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

30 posted on 10/18/2012 5:07:42 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lwd

“And 0bama just happened to somehow know she had brought it.”

Absolutely. You don’t just order someone to “get the transcript” without knowing that someone has the transcript.

There has to be some recourse, perhaps legally, to make Crowley answer for this. As Tucker Carlson said this a.m. on Fox, her stunt has the ability to ruin someone’s life/career. We need to browbeat the MSM until something is done about this.


31 posted on 10/18/2012 5:09:32 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SC_Pete

This is why she was given the power to pick the individuals as well as the questions.

Would it surprise anyone if we found out that Obama’s debate prep included the actual questions? Rehearsed right down to the part where FLOTUS breaks out into applause?

The Machine had to find a way to put the cocoon back around the Incompetent One.
Looks like they pulled it off.....for now.

And you JUST KNOW they are now preparing a similar approach for monday.


32 posted on 10/18/2012 5:12:42 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: don-o

I am trying and it is all because of you my dear FRiend.

LLS


33 posted on 10/18/2012 5:20:15 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

I love the imagery and well stated!

LLS


34 posted on 10/18/2012 5:22:07 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (OUR GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ARE NO LONGER TRUSTWORTHY OR DESERVING OF RESPECT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tentmaker

Exactly right, He knew she had the transcript, and asked her to read it!


35 posted on 10/18/2012 5:30:39 AM PDT by Halo-JM (Common Sense is not so Common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

I’ve asked the same question 100 times - why to Republican leaders continue to play this game? Why not hold a debate at Ave Maria University or Brigham Young? Why do they allow the likes of CNN and NPR to moderate? Why not insist that National Review organize at least one debate? Why hold debates in places like NY or Miami? Why not hold one in Topeka, KS?


36 posted on 10/18/2012 5:33:10 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Obama and Crowley choreographed the debate?   (Posted on 10/17/12 at 10:14 p.m.)
When the inevitable Libya question was asked, Obama baits Mitt by saying, “I said on day one that it was an act of terror.”

Mitt, knowing the administration sold the youtube theory around the world for nearly two weeks after the attack, moves in for the boom.

Obama says “check the transcript.”

Moderator picks up a piece of paper and says “he’s right.”

Why did Obama say “check the transcript” and Crowley just happened to have one sitting right in front of her? What are the odds?

Then what else is left for her to do, but incorrectly back up the president in front of millions of people. The most puzzling thing during this orchestrated insanity is the crowds applause as if the president has just been exonerated. They were in effect applauding the idea that the president knew it was a pre-planned terror attack on day one and had been lying to the world the whole time.

Did the president and Crowley orchestrate this exchange and bait Mitt into it?

On the AK47 question Mitt brought up fast and furious. Obama simply said, “Candy...”

On cue Candy interrupts Mitt and told him to stay on topic.


37 posted on 10/18/2012 5:41:15 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The key moment was when Obama appealed to the “moderator” with “Check the transcript”

How was Obama aware that transcript was on that stage?

He also appealed for her relief on Fast and Furious by pleading “Candy?” and got it.

I also noted some creative switching of the Obama/Romney getting asked the question in the latter 1/3 which resulted in Obama getting the final word with out rebuttal.


38 posted on 10/18/2012 5:42:34 AM PDT by ClockDoc (George)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

If you and i can figure this out, why the hell can’t the STOOPID PARTY figure it out? This crap happens every single time. The commies infuriate me, but the incompetence of the GOP leadership in managing the debates disgusts me.


39 posted on 10/18/2012 5:47:25 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77; Texas resident
He gets the s**t sandbagged out of him by The Machine in a hostile environment, with a hostile crowd (oh, excuse me, what I meant was "undecideds") and a calculating Obama faciltator for a moderator... and he STILL comes out of it all right. Not bad at all.

Many people are getting mighty tired of the State Run Media. Yes, indeed.

40 posted on 10/18/2012 5:49:15 AM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson