My comments from before:
At: :14 Romney starts he statement about how Obama did not call the attack terrorism.
At :29 Obama smugly tells Romney to proceed.
At :38 Obama tells Crowley “Get the transcript!”
At: :39 (possibly before the word transcript even completely leaves Obama’s mouth) Crowley states “he did infact”
So, we are to believe that amoung hundreds of speeches, policies, political ads, and actions of the two candidates, that Crowley was able to find and fact check the transcript of that exact particular speech within zero seconds?
Even if she decided to stop worring about what her next question would be, and immediately start fact checking at the transcripts :14 seconds, that would given her only 25 seconds to find and verify that statement.
I challenge anyone to try to verify any statement at some Rose Garden speech within 25 seconds, let alone ZERO seconds!!
I rarely subscribe to conspiracies, but there’s no way you can explain this other than a huge setup.
Nice Detail.....
It certainly appears that there was collaboration; and that the debate moderation was compromised.
Not only does this matter deserve a thorough, and immediate investigation; but there is another issue...
If this debate was compromised, what about upcoming Debate 3?
Perhaps the GOPers should demand that for the third debate, questions come only from candidates to one-another, thereby removing the deceitful and activist "news" media from the debate moderation process.
.
Which is obviously was. It started with the gentleman's questions, the questions chosen by Crowley herself.
O did not answer the man's question, but knew he could draw Romney into their net, Romney took the bait, and they were ready for him, to obviously ready.
Problem for them, THEY LIED (GULP)for all the world to hear, now Romney has the upper hand for Monday's debate. Unintended consequences can be a bear.
Think O is waking up in the night in panic sweats, and saying OH s..t!, what have I done now?
My comments from before:
At: :14 Romney starts he statement about how Obama did not call the attack terrorism.
At :29 Obama smugly tells Romney to proceed.
At :38 Obama tells Crowley “Get the transcript!”
At: :39 (possibly before the word transcript even completely leaves Obama’s mouth) Crowley states “he did infact”
So, we are to believe that amoung hundreds of speeches, policies, political ads, and actions of the two candidates, that Crowley was able to find and fact check the transcript of that exact particular speech within zero seconds?
Even if she decided to stop worring about what her next question would be, and immediately start fact checking at the transcripts :14 seconds, that would given her only 25 seconds to find and verify that statement.
I challenge anyone to try to verify any statement at some Rose Garden speech within 25 seconds, let alone ZERO seconds!!
I rarely subscribe to conspiracies, but there’s no way you can explain this other than a huge setup.
Great post, MNDude... thanks for those details.
“So, we are to believe that amoung hundreds of speeches, policies, political ads, and actions of the two candidates, that Crowley was able to find and fact check the transcript of that exact particular speech within zero seconds? “
No. Axelros already said this BS to Crowley on September 30. Crowley adopted this talking point she was fed by Axelrod.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2945905/posts