I had to go back to see what I posted because that doesn't sound like something I would say.
I posted “Ironically if Romney was POTUS it probably would be working’. I was imprecise with that comment so I can see how it could be read that way, my fault not yours.
What I was trying to say is that with O as ~ 4 year incumbent defending his record and Romney as challenger never POTUS the O : ‘tax the rich MORE so you feel it's fairer that everything is still crappy’ doesnt work that well.
BUT if Romney was the incumbent and O was the challenger and things sucked I bet THAT ‘raise taxes on the rich’ argument would play pretty well with voters, like 2008.
This is one of the parodoxes, victory brings defeat,.
I have no faith in Romney to fix anything, but that was not my point.