Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tenacious 1

Crowley was disgraceful. Beyond the procedural (cutting Romney off and not affording him the same opportunities to rebut she afforded Obama), she preselected the questions which were basically Dem talking points.


188 posted on 10/16/2012 8:17:12 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: trappedincanuckistan
"Crowley was disgraceful."

Yes, she was. She didn't challenge Obama on any of his statements, yet she challenged Romney over the "terror" comment, and it turns out he was right. Fox said their official figures show she gave Obama and extra 2 minutes to speak.

193 posted on 10/16/2012 8:24:50 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: trappedincanuckistan

I meant to say Fox’s unofficial figures, not official.


197 posted on 10/16/2012 8:27:14 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: trappedincanuckistan

Crowley was disgraceful, but what she did will help Romney win the post-debate spin over the next few days. She ensured that the one question people will be talking about is Libya. She exposed herself as biased by falsely “fact-checking” what Obama said in the Rose Garden. Now we’re going to spend the next few days debating what the administration did and didn’t say, and when they did and didn’t say it.


302 posted on 10/16/2012 10:22:38 PM PDT by dpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson