“You can’t first complain that the differences in the SCOTUS judges aren’t an endorsement, then also complain that they have way too much power.”
Sure I can. The underlying problem is the excess power of the judiciary; neither candidate has any interest in reining that in. They also don’t fundamentally disagree on the political perspective of those who should be appointed. So why is having one picking tweedle-dee all that different from the other picking tweedle-dum particularly when neither questions whether tweedle-dee or tweedle-dum should have the power that they do?
Oh, I see. You are another one of those "there is no difference between Obama and Romney"... If you genuinely can't see any difference then this topic is a waste of time.
Question... are you still a Democrat as your screenname states? If so, perhaps you could spend less time complaining about the moderate RINOs that have gained power in the GOP and do something about allowing the KGB to take over yours?