Posted on 10/13/2012 8:07:38 AM PDT by Gritty
I have searched for a blog or journalist to pick this up and post, at least, a partial transcript. Hunts' own words are emotional, jarring, and utterly factual by virtue of his personal knowledge of standard operating procedure when an embassy is attacked. This wasn't a mob; it wasn't a crime. It was a premediated, surgical, jihadist strike against our embassy---by definition, an act of war.
I keep thinking of that tragic mother of one of the slain who has gone public saying Hillary, Biden, the President, Rice, and Panetta all had individual, personal conversations with her to reassure her they will get to the bottom of this. Panetta even clasped his two hands around her face, so heartfelt was he.
I am more disgusted and outraged than I have words to describe. Hunt said the same thing happened in Mogadishu, and we all remember how horrifying that scene was, but in this case there was NO protest, NO mob- just a surgical jihad operation viewed instantaneously in real time by governmental operations centers all over the world, including CIA, Dept of State and WH situation room, for over 6 hours.
Hunt said any military order would have had to originate from the WH, and there was none.
BTW: 'US must ignore violence to boost ME democracies' [Hillary quote from speech on Friday]
Thank you. Just sent the link to my entire e-mail list.
“Wasnt this also the night that Obama went to bed at 11 PM EST, when the presumed ultimate killing was at 3 AM EST?”
And Obama woke up to learn of the death of Ambassador Stevens, we were told.
Bad enough, BUT if randita’s statement is factually accurate (post 26)...:
“Libya is 6 hours ahead of EST. The attack began about 9:30 PM Libyan time which would have only been 3:30 PM EST. Obama would have been golfing about that time - not in bed.”
WHO was in the WH situation room watching and listening while this attack was taking place? If Obama wasn’t present, how many times was he updated during those 6 hours?
I’ve posted this before but am sharing.
read this over at hillbuzz. Just a thought, but it sounds like something that narcisist would do.
Did Obama deliberately try to stage a hostage takin in Benghazi as an October Surprse PR stunt that blew up in his face?
The plan if you were paying attention was set in motion at the Democrats convention in Charlotte in early September when repeated mentions of Obama as a foreign policy president were made.
This was timed to lead up to September 11th when deliberately lowered security at the Benghazi consulate (and OTHER consulates and embassies in the Mideast) was supposed to encourage Muslims to take Americans hostage like they did in 1979. Only, Obamas plan was to negotiate their quick released by trading the Blind Sheik from the 1993 World Trade Center bombings for any Americans taken hostage on 9/11/2012.
The plan was to make Obama look like a badass and a to have him revel in this through October and into the November election. In fact, the hostages were probably planned for release not long before the Foreign Policy Debate (the last of the three presidential debates this year) in Boca Raton, Florida.
This was supposed to show Obama standing up to Muslims, negotiating peace, and proving to the world what an effective and strong leader he was.
Only it blew up in his face and the administration has been in overdrive trying to cover this stuff up ever since.
The only way any of this makes any sense, including the deliberate lowering of security and the disregard of Ambassador Chris Stevens multiple pleas for help on the ground in Libya in the weeks prior to his murder, is that Barack Obama WANTED a hostage situation to happen so he could look presidential by resolving it in October but the Muslims in Libya went overboard and killed people instead of just taking them hostage.
This also explains why no effort was made to even look for the Ambassador and others missing from the consulate for many hours: Obamas gang just assumed he was taken hostage as planned and were STUNNED to learn the ambassador was murdered.
ping
“BTW, the link now leads to a blank page.”
This should work. Direct link:
Obama went to bed.
“Did Obama deliberately try to stage a hostage takin in Benghazi as an October Surprse PR stunt that blew up in his face?”
You are giving way too much credit to the crowd in the WH. They are buffoons. There is no way they could have planned this out. The tragedy was a result of bumbling lead from behind Obama incompetence.
If there was really some grand October surprise plan we would have photos of the kenyan in the situation room supervising the crisis. Instead he was asleep in his jammies while a U. S. ambassador was killed. No way that was in the plan and is disgusting.
Daniel Pearl was a “do-gooder” too. He really wanted to be respectful and “fair” with the militants, and do an even-handed story about them.
Well, you saw what they did to him.
It is very sad, but indicative of the profound ignorance liberals have the the demonic mindset of the enemy.
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I dont add you to the list...
Was he sleeping or getting ready to go on the View to bless the world as “eye candy”?
We need a photo shop of Big Bird in that situation room pic.
Big Turd is sitting in the corner.
That’s why guillotines from orbit is the only way to be sure media is cleaned up ...
Thanks. I don’t get why people like him take leave of their senses and vote for an Obama... who you could see a million miles away where he was coming from (revanchist 3rd world Marxism) and where he was headed (to bring down America to 3rd world status because we are only wealthy due to robing the non-white world)
"Weapons Hunting - The Reason For The 9-11 Murders In Libya"...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.