Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

You are right, it’s not second grade math. It’s probably closer to first grade. Yes, I’m being serious.

Without a doubt I’ve wasted enough time on this subject matter. You obvious cannot understand the basic premise of modeling or statistics. Rasmussen, just like every single pollster that is currently publishing polls for the 2012 GE is oversampling democrats. FACT!

BTW, I’m an engineer so math comes pretty darned easy for me.

~ciao


60 posted on 10/11/2012 8:10:21 AM PDT by tatown ( FUMD, FUAC, and FUGB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: tatown
Read Rasmussen's words again:

"By Election Day [2004], our baseline was still 35-39-26 but our Likely Voters sample had just over 36% R and just under 38% D. If we [had] adjusted to 37-37-26, we [would have] nailed the actual election."

Rasmussen is SAYING that he adjusts his baseline with his LV sample. What more do you really need than Rasmussen's own words?

61 posted on 10/11/2012 8:27:23 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson