Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas

Ras’s old model was R +3.4

His new model is R +2.6

According to Ras, that is. I’ve seen nothing convincing that proves otherwise than what Ras says on his website. Nor can I come up with a good reason for him to publicize these numbers on his website and then do something entirely different.


38 posted on 10/10/2012 9:54:08 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

We can’t assume his party affiliation numbers are the numbers he uses to weight his sample by party.

He might, but I’ve heard ad nauseam here that he doesn’t.

Too many assumptions on all sides, I suspect.


40 posted on 10/10/2012 9:58:59 AM PDT by Kingosaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

How in the hell can Rasmussen be using R+2.6 when he has Romney winning Independents by a significant margin, yet has the race tied? Only 3 weeks ago Rasmussen himself said D+2 to D+4. Cruising For Freedom just calculated that he is now up to D+5.

There is no possibly way for Rasmussen to be oversampling R’s and have Romney winning I’s by a significant margin, yet have the race tied! To try and argue otherwise is simple idiocy.


41 posted on 10/10/2012 10:01:51 AM PDT by tatown ( FUMD, FUAC, and FUGB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson