I said this - in a reduced form - in a post about a week ago.
The fact that we’re even discussing it as plausible is a pretty sickening reflection on Obama and his friends.
In the end, it sounds too far too me (possible though - I sense there is at least something beyond pure incompetence involved) but the main thing is - I wouldn’t put it past them - and that in itself says enough.
Would they do it if they could pull it off? This administration? In a second.
It’s always been part of Commie and Muslim code - all cult style codes where the individual is expendable - that if something furthers the great vision, it is by default not immoral - including all forms of immorality and trickery.
” I said this - in a reduced form - in a post about a week ago. “
(Are we allowed to say/reference LameCherry? so I will try:)
Way back, near the very beginning of this all, the LC blog had a, as usual, long and fully detailed post which laid out exactly this as the reason it was planned, for a hostage situation - wonder where they would have gotten that idea hmmmm - and our superman/gal (or superzer0) would ride to the rescue with great acclamation at just the right time.
Ever since reading that post, this explanation has seemed perfectly logical to me, like putting the right size peg in right size hole. And all the other explanations folks have been coming up with just never seemed to fit right in that hole.