Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: floralamiss
I believe our embassies are considered sacrosanct and as being on American soil.

http://diplomacy.state.gov/discoverdiplomacy/diplomacy101/places/170537.htm

You are incorrect. However, you are right in stating that to some people, no crime is too heinous.

51 posted on 10/08/2012 9:49:22 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel_Flagg

I stand corrected, but not entirely. The link you provided states, “while an embassy remains the territory of the host state, under international rules, representatives of the host country may not enter an embassy without permission—even to put out a fire.”

Therefore, our embassies represent our sovereignty, but not on our own soil, remaining the territory of the host state, but they do remain sacrosanct and inviolate. “Any attack on an embassy is considered an attack on the country it represents.”


53 posted on 10/08/2012 10:24:38 PM PDT by floralamiss ("For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson