Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oust the louse

Having a customer arrested seems extreme, too. If Ellmer has any sense, he’ll settle for whatever he can get away with. Swearing out a false criminal complaint is a *HUGE* deal, imho. Whoever reported the “theft” to the coppers needs to do some time. They figure they are big respected auto dealer and this guy is just some little guy they can steamroller. Screw, them, I think $2.3 million would teach them a lesson.


24 posted on 10/08/2012 5:56:12 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Orwell in the throes of a demonic possession could not have come up with the "tuck rule".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“Screw, them, I think $2.3 million would teach them a lesson.”

My feelings too. Business operates on a relationship of trust between the client and the provider. Filing a false report to cover up your own mistake needs to be punished.


30 posted on 10/08/2012 6:01:32 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Swearing out a false criminal complaint is a *HUGE* deal, imho. Whoever reported the “theft” to the coppers needs to do some time. They figure they are big respected auto dealer and this guy is just some little guy they can steamroller. Screw, them, I think $2.3 million would teach them a lesson.

Exactly - having an arrest on your record - even if proven bogus - is still an arrest warrant on your record.

Wherever you go - apply for a position, etc, that question is on the ap for a "yes" or "no" answer and can cost big time.

In this case, they guy needs to get compensated big time.

2,2 million seems a lot - but nearly half of that will go to legal fees - unless he can make the dealership liable for them - and half will go to the gov't in taxes (taxes , in these cases, are on the FULL amount - no deduction for legal fees. That actually leaves the man with a small chunk.

Indeed, there are cases where the person ends up OWING taxes - 60%A to legal, 50% to taxes ='s 110% of judgment and person still owes 10% in taxes, and cannot file bankuptcy on it.

I remember a case a few years ago where a gal ended up owing additional taxes of $100,000 - which left her in dire straights as the gov't insists on their money NOW.

The big winners in these suits are the lawyers and the gov't.

49 posted on 10/08/2012 6:31:47 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson