Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
UNFORTUNATELY IT'S NOT QUITE LONG ENOUGH:

But we've been through that before, haven't we?

KEEP YOUR EYE ON THE TOOTH!

71 posted on 10/10/2012 5:57:31 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks
You are not getting what I am saying. You keep going back to those same pictures, but you are not using the pictures that I select. (Which seems to be a consistency you have.)

In the pictures I selected, both girls appear to have long chins. As near as I can judge, they are the same length. Compare their chins.

Just in case you missed it the first six times I've said it, I am suggesting that the three original pictures (one of which is above.) might be Stanley Ann, but the other pictures discovered by Gilbert are not.

Why don't you compare the visible length of chins from the original (John Ray) three pictures with the Gilbert pictures? Or Why don't you resize and compare the jaw length of the John Ray picture above, with the Stanley Ann picture above?

72 posted on 10/10/2012 6:07:19 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks
As a matter of fact, you've almost done that here. Look at these two women.

Look how long is the chin of the woman in the John Ray photograph. Do they look like they have the same chin length to you? They certainly look like they have different chin lengths to me.

73 posted on 10/10/2012 6:10:20 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson