Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rampant recycling fraud is draining California cash [They built it]
Las Angeles Times ^ | October 7, 2012 | Jessica Garrison

Posted on 10/07/2012 1:56:25 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Just over 8.5 billion recyclable cans were sold in California last year. The number redeemed for a nickel under California's recycling law: 8.3 billion.

That's a return rate of nearly 100%.

That kind of success isn't just impressive, it's unbelievable. But the recycling rate for certain plastic containers was even higher: 104%.

California's generous recycling redemption program has led to rampant fraud. Crafty entrepreneurs are driving semi-trailers full of cans from Nevada or Arizona, which don't have deposit laws, across the border and transforming their cargo into truckfuls of nickels. In addition, recyclers inside the state are claiming redemptions for the same containers several times over, or for containers that never existed.

The illicit trade is draining the state's $1.1-billion recycling fund. Government officials recently estimated the fraud at $40 million a year, and an industry expert said it could exceed $200 million. It's one reason the strapped fund paid out $100 million more in expenses last year than it took in from deposits and other sources.

"The law says California has to make it easy to recycle … so anyone with a devious mind, it's so easy, they can just go right in," said Los Angeles County Sheriff's Deputy Dave Chapman, who has investigated fraud rings in recent months.

Under the state's 25-year-old recycling law, California charges consumers a deposit on most beverage containers sold within its borders. Anyone who brings empty containers back to one of about 2,300 privately run recycling centers can collect 5 cents for most cans and bottles and 10 cents for larger containers.

Only products sold in California are eligible. But a can is a can — and many recycling centers in California aren't that interested in where they come from.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: environment; green; nannystate; recycle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: FreedomNotSafety

$16/month. No one is really coerced but it is so simple to throw recyclables in one container that I put out maybe once every three weeks if I choose. And the trashbag of garbage and slop is now so small that it would be hardly worth taking to the curb except for the smell. Our community actually made money off the recyclables last year.


41 posted on 10/07/2012 3:50:23 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I find it strange that you pay the California Redemption Value (CRV) on a per container basis, and the container says how much you should get back per container at a recycling center. However, when you go to the recycling center, your
CRV is based on the total weight of the containers recycled and not on the total number of containers brought in.


42 posted on 10/07/2012 3:58:20 PM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reily
I remember reading probably 20 years ago a paper published in Science that did a energy usage study on recycling. The paper's conclusion was that recycling was a energy hog!

Depends upon what it is. Aluminum actually makes sense as a recylcable material because it is very energy intensive to process raw ore into aluminum, compared to the energy it takes to resmelt aluminum cans.

Paper, on the other hand, is not recycle friendly at all. It's actually more expensive to recycle paper than it is worth. The same for the most part can be said about glass, unless you're not as concerned about the appearance of the glass you produce. You can't, to the best of my knowledge, produce clear glass unless you only have clear glass fed into the stream.



43 posted on 10/07/2012 4:03:01 PM PDT by zeugma (Rid the world of those savages. - Dorothy Woods, widow of a Navy Seal, AMEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
I agree
I don't remember the details of the paper any more. I am trying to remember what the big recycling issues were at the time. Since my skepticism was aimed at my mother-in-law's enthusiastic household recycling activities it was likely paper, glass, plastics and probably cans. So in metal cans I might concede the point. Maybe.

I do remember the Science paper being quite comprehensive. I wish I could remember more. I wish I could remember the title & author!

44 posted on 10/07/2012 4:51:45 PM PDT by Reily (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: basil

I only recycle pizza boxes. Nothing else.

One pizza box can destroy a whole batch of recycled cardboard.


45 posted on 10/07/2012 4:53:52 PM PDT by Morris70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobertClark

“Privatizing the CA system would fix it all. Gov’t attempting to make a share of the profits has a way of screwing everything up.”

I live in the Bay Area in CA. We have had for many,many years curbside recycling. We have one contractor who picks up the garbage (small wheeled cart) and another who picks up the “recyclables” and the “green waste” (that are in separate large wheeled carts). He dumps both carts in the same truck, but he gets pissed off if you put some green waste in the recyclables bin and vice versa. Go figure! He also picks up used motor oil in gallon milk jugs, but if you try to put it out in a milk jug from the store, he won’t take it because it doesn’t have a hazmat label on it! Oh, and they are not permitted to touch anything you put out, so if they miss and drop stuff on the street, they drive off and leave it.


46 posted on 10/07/2012 5:30:39 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: basil
I don’t recycle anything.......

I do. About once a day, I pee outside.

47 posted on 10/07/2012 6:07:59 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“America is truly a fortunate land ~ we have to think about dealing with trash......”

Yes, we are most fortunate, but I don’t understand what that’s to do with my point, which was addressing the source of policy, not recycling.


48 posted on 10/07/2012 7:07:59 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

TMI !!!!


49 posted on 10/07/2012 8:07:16 PM PDT by basil (Second Amendment Sisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

kind of humorous actually...When California set this up they counted on making a bonanza from cans bottles never redeemed but thrown into the landfill. But the redeemed numbers are very close to the sold (and taxed 5 cents) number due to influx of out of state cans. So no windfall for California to squander


50 posted on 10/08/2012 4:37:35 AM PDT by dennisw (Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Eventually, you run out of other people’s money.


51 posted on 10/08/2012 5:05:17 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: basil
TMI !!!!

I recycle. I'm doing my part.

Sewage and septic systems are overloaded nationwide, and create a lot of greenhouse gasses.

I am contributing to the natural harmony of the earth and providing needed nutrients to the plants and animals therein and thereon.

52 posted on 10/08/2012 4:46:17 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson