Wag the dog gone wrong.
You just look at the timing of this (Aug), and wonder who knew what was going on, and told interested parties what was going to occur?
In 2004 they didn't intend for Nick Berg to be killed he was just supposed to make the video.
This time they didn't intend for the Ambassador to be killed they intended for him to be taken hostage, then blame Romney and the republicans of collaborating with the terrorist to make Obama look like Carter.
In Hillary's statement she contradicts herself. While she is claiming it was spontaneous because of the video, she is also implying it was planned by someone to hurt the Obama Administration.
The “journal” found by CNN is just a tad bit too convenient. Reminds me of the revolver found in Vince Fosters hand.
That is a real possibility. But I can't figure out how it could have gone right. Any ideas?