Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pgyanke
Insurance is to protect you from unlikely events; mandating that insurance plans must accept people with pre-existing conditions takes them out of the business of insurance.

Why not mandate that hospitals provide treatment of all “pre-existing conditions” for a flat rate of, say, $20 an hour, all drugs and tests included?

If you mandated the latter, hospitals would go out of business because their business would no longer be profitable, and you would have no place to go to get your condition treated.

Maybe Obama can mandate that gasoline be sold for no more than $1.50 a gallon. That will solve gas prices in the same way Obamacare is solving our medical costs mess. Everyone has a right to $1.50 gas but no one can actually find any.

61 posted on 10/06/2012 4:44:04 AM PDT by Puddleglum (http://www.facebook.com/paulhawkinsauthoradventurerexplorer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Puddleglum

What about a child diagnosed with diabetes or one who ran a bout with cancer at five years old? What about a girl with a heart condition from a birth defect that requires a stint?

All of these people (now grown) are not ‘disabled’ in the traditional sense. The grow up, try to go to school or work, but can’t get insured because of things that were inflicted on them as children.

If there’s a gap in my son’s insurance, the great state of Texas said that he could join the state insurance while he looked for work...

if he paid $3000 a MONTH.

Not a year. A MONTH. I called twice and made sure that I heard them correctly.

A healthy 19 year old would have to pay $3000 a MONTH to keep continuous coverage. Without a job.

Because he has a ‘preexisting condition’. A condition that wasn’t anybody’s fault. It’s not caused by smoking or eating wrong. It’s an autoimmune disease.

Trust me, diagnosed at 9 years old, he wasn’t waiting to get sick to get health insurance.

He’s not sick enough to get disability, but if he doesn’t get a shot every four hours, he dies.

He’s the most optimistic human being that I’ve ever met. The ONLY thing that I’ve seen him get depressed enough to blow his brains out over is the impossible task of maintaining health insurance.

Obamacare isn’t the answer, but we can’t keep ignoring the problem. We can’t assume that it’s a simple matter of ‘get a job’.

This forum is the most pro-life forum out there, but once my partially disabled son hits 18, y’all want to throw him to the wolves. Tell him to go figure out a puzzle that’s impossible to figure out. The deck is stacked in such a way that kids with lifetime problems and the working poor have no hope.

The preexisting issue is a REAL problem.

I’m voting for Romney and repeal of Obamacare - even though I’m terrified for my son. I’m doing it because I truly believe that my son’s best hope is a thriving economy. I believe that Obamacare is MUCH worse for everyone - including my son.

I’m libertarian enough to want the gov’t out of the problem-solving business, but we’ve got a LOT of people who wouldn’t have survived childhood illnesses just 60 years ago that keep on ticking.

The natural order has been disrupted by modern medicine and our economy has not caught up.


64 posted on 10/06/2012 5:48:05 AM PDT by Marie ("The last time Democrats gloated this hard after a health care victory, they lost 60 House seats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson