[turn_to]

Mitt did ok, not great, but ok. The only reason he “won” the debate was because Obama did so bad.

Let’s not hype Mitt in something he is not, and let’s not forget what he is.

[jivin gene]

“Mitt did ok, not great, but ok. The only reason he “won” the debate was because Obama did so bad.Let’s not hype Mitt in something he is not, and let’s not forget what he is.”

And, lest we forget what you is.

[Revolting cat!]

I don’t know who to turn to for a better opinion?

[MrDem]

Baloney!

[swpa_mom]

What Mitt “is”?

Oh, you mean a successful businessman? We’re trillions in debt, community organizing didn’t do the job, a businessman just might.

Or, do you mean a man who won’t blow off a head of state to attend a fundraiser with a Hollywood type?

Around the water cooler, the talk is about enthusiam for Romney. Obama’s out of the picture.

GET OUT THERE AND VOTE

[Theodore R.]

Mitt did ok, not great, but ok. The only reason he “won” the debate was because Obama did so bad. Let’s not hype Mitt in something he is not, and let’s not forget what he is.

I agree with this analysis. Let's hope Mittens gets on the move this week. Surely, he knows the media will declare Obama the winner of the two coming debates no matter what.

[Trailerpark Badass]

Not fucking surprised Mr. Newbie_Concerntroll-Self-appointed-conscience wants to dampen enthusiasm.