"You know, you can't tell the American people up is down and down is up and ignore your history and ignore your statements,"
Axelrod and Obama tell the American people up is down and down is up and ignore history.
"You can't square the circle, and President Obama Gov. Romney is going to be held accountable for that."
Obama and Axelrod lie and are worried they will be held accountable.
Obama Romney of playing "a shell game" at the debate"
Axelrod and Obama were playing "a shell game" at the debate
"the Democratic Republican nominee deserved "an 'F' for being honest with the American people."
Obama deserves "an 'F'
He won't be able to escape the public scorn seeping through the cocoon they keep him in and it will work on him like dripping acid. Speaking of dripping acid, there's the Mooch; she's gonna be all over his butt. She even started before he got off the stage.
His state of mind when he has to step out on the stage again with Romney will be very tenuous. He will have tried to rebuild the mythic bubble around his ego by latching onto every lame excuse proffered but deep inside he'll know that he's not up to the task. We may see something spectacular in the next debate.
That’s right, Obama camp, keep fooling yourself that it was a communications gap that caused last night’s debate performance.
It was a competency gap. Nothing can overcome such a huge competency gap.
Dare I say (as a woman) that Romney actually came across not only as brilliant and confident...but rather sexy? Lucky Mrs.....
[Later on Mr. Axelrod stepped out in his full-length overcoat to go flash little girls at the playground.]
I joked that Mitt Romney put more preparation into it than they did into the invasion in Normandy and you saw last night,” Axelrod said. “I expected a strong performance, got a strong performance, but that’s what it was — a performance.”
Axel Dork.
Yes, Mitt was as serious about overthrowing a tyrant, and restoring freedom as we were at Normandy.
Performance means just what it says. You state a goal, and achieve it. Thereby
having performed.
Mitts into real life performance, and accountability.
You/your stooge is into theater performance. Feels good, but doesn’t really help real life.
An IQ of 50 will still be an IQ of 50 in the next debate and there still won’t be a teleprompter to fake improvement!
That ship has sailed, Davy. The next debate is on foreign policy.
REBUILD THEM??? Would that be the same economy and middle class that he's spent the last four years ripping to shreds? Now you say he's going to do the opposite.
Davey-boy, with all this spinning, you must be dizzier than a drunk blond cheerleader by now!
Your candidate in his closing mentioned "fair share" and government's role as "channeling" the activities of "the People." Now, that is upside-down thinking!!! Under our "People's" Constitution, "We, the People" do the "channeling," and our servants in the branches of government protect our Creator-endowed individual rights to do so.
Americans might ask this President who is that exceptionally-qualified person/persons in government who do the "channeling" and by what authority? Certainly, the authority is not to be found in the United States Constitution!
America's Founders' principle of freedom for individual enterprise brought America from the crude tools of ancient Europe to the most free and prosperous destination for oppressed peoples. See the following essay excerpted from "Our Ageless Constitution," a 292-page history of the ideas of liberty in America.
"Agriculture, manufactures, commerce, and navigation, the four pillars of our prosperity, are the most thriving when left most free to individual enterprise." - Thomas Jefferson
"The enviable condition of the people of the United States is often too much ascribed to the physical advantages of their soil & climate .... But a just estimate of the happiness of our country will never overlook what belongs to the fertile activity of a free people and the benign influence of a responsible government." - James Madison
America's Constitution did not mention freedom of enterprise per se, but it did set up a system of laws to secure individual liberty and freedom of choice in keeping with Creator-endowed natural rights. Out of these, free enterprise flourished naturally. Even though the words "free enterprise' are not in the Constitution, the concept was uppermost in the minds of the Founders, typified by the remarks of Jefferson and Madison as quoted above. Already, in 1787, Americans were enjoying the rewards of individual enterprise and free markets. Their dedication was to securing that freedom for posterity.
The learned men drafting America's Constitution understood history - mankind's struggle against poverty and government oppression. And they had studied the ideas of the great thinkers and philosophers. They were familiar with the near starvation of the early Jamestown settlers under a communal production and distribution system and Governor Bradford's diary account of how all benefited after agreement that each family could do as it wished with the fruits of its own labors. Later, in 1776, Adam Smith's INQUIRY INTO THE NATURE AND CAUSES OF THE WEALTH OF NATIONS and Say's POLITICAL ECONOMY had come at just the right time and were perfectly compatible with the Founders' own passion for individual liberty. Jefferson said these were the best books to be had for forming governments based on principles of freedom. They saw a free market economy as the natural result of their ideal of liberty. They feared concentrations of power and the coercion that planners can use in planning other peoples lives; and they valued freedom of choice and acceptance of responsibility of the consequences of such choice as being the very essence of liberty. They envisioned a large and prosperous republic of free people, unhampered by government interference.
The Founders believed the American people, possessors of deeply rooted character and values, could prosper if left free to:
|
|
Such a free market economy was, to them, the natural result of liberty, carried out in the economic dimension of life. Their philosophy tended to enlarge individual freedom - not to restrict or diminish the individual's right to make choices and to succeed or fail based on those choices. The economic role of their Constitutional government was simply to secure rights and encourage commerce. Through the Constitution, they granted their government some very limited powers to:
Adam Smith called it "the system of natural liberty." James Madison referred to it as "the benign influence of a responsible government." Others have called it the free enterprise system. By whatever name it is called, the economic system envisioned by the Founders and encouraged by the Constitution allowed individual enterprise to flourish and triggered the greatest explosion of economic progress in all of history. Americans became the first people truly to realize the economic dimension of liberty.
Footnote: Our Ageless Constitution, W. David Stedman & La Vaughn G. Lewis, Editors (Asheboro, NC, W. David Stedman Associates, 1987) Part III: ISBN 0-937047-01-5
He started out by telling everyone to ignore the past few years and focus on the future. this was after he spent the last four years blaming everything on the previous eight years..
No Axlerod, you can’t make something from nothing and yelling a lie is not going to make it more believable.
nobama will hopefully resign in the middle of the next debate, asking for a plea bargain that will keep him (and his oafish clown-wife) out of Leavenworth. You saw it here first.
His monster is loose in the village without a teleprompter, and Dr. Frankenstein is not happy.
Or, maybe his "binky".
Maybe Michelle will give him cues like they do in baseball.
Not only did he look lost out there, he also seemed to have a Nixonian makeup artist. Looks like his hair has been recently dyed with just enough gray at the temples - no doubt for "gravitas"!
In the next debate, Obama will not be debating Romney, he will be debating Obama from the first debate.
-PJ