To: CatherineofAragon
I saw a picture of our first lady, and she is ours, where she is holding a piece of vegetation close to her face. The caption unfortunately stated something along the lines of “are mountain gorillas really herbivores?” I am sure that comment was only because of her enormous glutes, which evoke mental images of our evolutionary ancestors, such as gorillas. Does anyone remember the photo taken in Europe where she was walking up a set of stairs flanked by Carla Bruni, arguably the culmination of the evolutionary process, and another average size woman? Our first lady's glutes were twice, at least,the width of those other women. The Times should comment on her enormous glutes instead of her arms. With glutes that huge she must squat eight or nine hundred pounds. And yet, I doubt that she could curl anything more that a large bunch of bananas, which weigh about twenty pounds and are loaded in potassium and very good for all of us. As a guy, I have been told to evolve,I think it is even a democrat imperative, but maybe our first lady should evolve. Her proportions just do not seem to have reached modernity yet.
10 posted on
10/02/2012 12:44:16 PM PDT by
T bench
("God wills it." Urban II)
To: T bench
22 posted on
10/02/2012 1:20:19 PM PDT by
CatherineofAragon
(Don't be afraid to see what you see. (Ronald Reagan))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson