Can't wait to have a modestly dressed, classy FLOTUS in the WH again. I miss Laura Bush.
1 posted on
10/02/2012 12:21:18 PM PDT by
DFG
To: DFG
"It's time to face the truth: we don't all look like the first lady." And I for one am thankful I don't look like that ugly hulking manbeast.
2 posted on
10/02/2012 12:24:27 PM PDT by
CatherineofAragon
(Don't be afraid to see what you see. (Ronald Reagan))
To: DFG
Michelle’s brother was on one of the morning news shows today.
He’s the spitting image of a bald Michelle, same vocal inflections and mannerisms.
It was creepy. Family gatherings of that clan must be very intersting.
3 posted on
10/02/2012 12:25:09 PM PDT by
chrisser
(Starve the Monkeys!)
To: DFG
Stupid article. I am disgusted with Michelle Obama's politics on the rare occasions that she comments on real issues about our country, a country she was in her own words never "proud of" until her husband could take power. I am disgusted with Michelle's efforts to improve fitness among kids, not by modeling an active life or by talking up the benefits and encouraging but by using government force - by, for example, presuring school systems to cut the calories in school lunches without corresponding cuts in the price.
Despite that, both the drooling NYT article and the critical response are simply stupid. The big issues are the damage that crony capitalism and the transition to some form of socialism will do to our economy and to our freedom, the damage that ObamaCare will do to our economy and to our freedom, and the damage that Obama's other national socialist or soviet socialist policies will do to our economy and to our freedom. Michelle's questionable beauty and Obama's shirtless appeal to the sort of men who like skinny guys with limited clothing are such trivial issues that they should not be allowed to distract us from the immediate danger posed by Obama's agenda.
4 posted on
10/02/2012 12:33:25 PM PDT by
Pollster1
(Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
To: DFG
Other than her color, Michelle could easily be confused for one of those East German bulked-up and hulking Olympic athletes. Very manly, and fugly.
5 posted on
10/02/2012 12:34:44 PM PDT by
adorno
To: DFG
Well I remember her having rather flabby arms. It’s taken her four years as the First Lady to tone up her arms??? Sad.
To: DFG
In this white house Michell is the manly one and Bammy has girly man looks.
What a bunch of losers.
8 posted on
10/02/2012 12:40:51 PM PDT by
History Repeats
(Drink plenty of TEA, but avoid the Koolaid.)
To: DFG
11 posted on
10/02/2012 12:45:22 PM PDT by
pabianice
(washington, dc ..)
To: DFG
I’m tired of seeing every TV bimbo going sleeveless no matter what the weather or the season as they pledge allegiance to the most profligate First Lady in our history. Most have flabby white arms that are no match for the muscled Amazon in the White House, but they keep hoping no one will notice.
And we are supposed to take these faddish intellectual adolescents seriously?
To: DFG
Whenever I see her sleeveless, I wonder if she’s a tranny...seriously.
To: DFG
'This' while America burns. . .
14 posted on
10/02/2012 12:51:07 PM PDT by
cricket
To: DFG
I miss Laura Bush. Amen. A true lady. Ladies are more than their arms.
15 posted on
10/02/2012 12:52:30 PM PDT by
Faith
To: DFG
17 posted on
10/02/2012 1:00:31 PM PDT by
boomop1
(term limits will only save this country.)
To: DFG
Is she proud of her country a second time?
To: DFG
20 posted on
10/02/2012 1:08:27 PM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
To: DFG
" . . . her arms-- her bare, toned, elegant arms."
21 posted on
10/02/2012 1:14:27 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
("The slobs in that 'People of Walmart' photo are gross. Oh, wait, those are people attending Mass.")
To: DFG
24 posted on
10/02/2012 1:26:36 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives)
To: DFG
What about Benghazi?
What about "Fast & Furious"?
Speaking of Moochelle... what about her big fat @$$?
25 posted on
10/02/2012 1:36:42 PM PDT by
Bon mots
(Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
To: DFG
I remember hearing about the "eye candy" comment, but I didn't know exactly how Obama phrased it.
Last week, when he and the first lady were on The View, the president made it clear he didnt seem entirely unaware of his physical appeal, joking (or was he?) with the cast that I told folks Im just supposed to be eye candy here for you guys.
Guys??? LOL! Now I know that Obama is prone to using the slang term "you guys" a lot when he talks to people, but I think this time he intended for it to have a double meaning. You know, with his obvious support of homosexuality.
But, on the subject of the thread...it is truly a sad commentary that anyone votes based on someone's appearance. That said, I think Obama is skinny, his legs and arms are lanky, his ears are too big his lips are purple, and he has a phony smile. To me, he is not at all attractive. And Michelle...well as long as you only look at her oiled arms (which are too long anyway) and not the rest of her body. 'Nuff said.
26 posted on
10/02/2012 1:39:23 PM PDT by
CitizenM
(Obama - The architect of the decline of the U.S.)
To: DFG
What about "Fast & Furious"?
What about Benghazi?
Coverup; Whitewash; Media Blackout... Everyone to blame but Obama/Clinton
27 posted on
10/02/2012 1:44:20 PM PDT by
Bon mots
(Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
To: DFG
28 posted on
10/02/2012 2:00:27 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson