Skip to comments.
Barack Obama's Terrorist Attack Cover-Up
American Thinker ^
| 9/29/2012
| Sara Goss
Posted on 09/30/2012 11:23:48 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: Venturer
" This is the first I have read about helicopters and Marines going to the rescue. "
And we are told that this would be the most transparent Administration ever.
I guess they are borrowing from the story of when Carter sent in the Marines in his attempt to rescue the 52 hostages from Iran, because we are never given the truth from this Administration unless they are telling us that our taxes are going up.
This perhaps ? Maybe ? this is where they are getting their story from ?
How can the people of America know the truth of what happened without them giving us more information...
To: RoosterRedux
With all that's involved here it's starting to appear that this was NO response to some " FILM " and more and more that this was all planned and this administration knew about it.
Who's to say ?
That these guy's were once allies turned enemy because of some negotiations went bad ?
or some deal that Obama, SoS, Chris Stevens promised them went bad ?
What's the likelihood ? that ?
This was some kind of deal, promise that the Obama administration made with the Libyan rebels and it all went bad and this administration wanted to use the " FILM " as some cover ? to use the film as a excuse if things went bad ?
To: Ohiobelle
This sounds more and more like some kind of deal that this Administration made with the Rebels went sour or went bad and this Administration wanted to use the " FILM " as some lame excuse to CYA.
So ? as more news comes out there might be more injuries ? deaths involved in this ?
To: American Constitutionalist
24
posted on
09/30/2012 12:08:51 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: American Constitutionalist
Here are excerpts from 2 articles talking about all the people rescued and about David Ubben who is at Walter reed. Where are all these people now? The administration had at least 30 to 60 people who were there to give first hand info. This was not a fog of war. I am convinced this was supposed to be a kidnapping intone bad.
“While squeezing Secretary Clinton’s hand and choking back tears, I told her that what worried me was that my son died possibly thinking that he had failed in the mission he was to carry out, that of protecting Ambassador Stevens and the people in the compound”
“Looking me firmly in the eye, she told me that my son did not fail. She called him a hero and that if not for him, the 30 people inside the consulate would not have made it out. He was doing his job, fighting for his life, putting others ahead of his own safety, but then that was his job, which he did well.”
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/09/28/murdered_ex_seal_s_mother_frustrated_by_pace_of_benghazi_investigation
At the annex, Mr. Ubben suffered head and leg injuries from a mortar explosion. He was released this week from intensive care but remains at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, in Bethesda, Md., the State Department official familiar with his role said.
Mr. Ubben, a Marylander, is married and has a stepdaughter and an infant son. He is conscious and able to communicate, according to his father, Rex Ubben.
“He’s in good spirits,” the senior Mr. Ubben said. “They’re pretty confident that he’ll be able to walk again.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444165804578008411144721162.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
25
posted on
09/30/2012 12:10:34 PM PDT
by
gulf1609
To: Ohiobelle
These Marines had live ammo. You are thinking of the Marines stationed at the embassy in Cairo, Egypt.
26
posted on
09/30/2012 12:11:13 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: TigersEye
Sounds more like a deal gone bad, or some kind of negotiations went totally wrong and Obama is trying to cover his tracks.
To: American Constitutionalist
Speculations can run rampant when the press refuses to do their job.
Some also think these attacks were intended to shut down the CIA operation underway to track down manpads. If so it worked.
28
posted on
09/30/2012 12:15:29 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: RoosterRedux
I hate to say it but I don’t think there were any intentions of saving Stevens. I’d give anything to have read Stevens journal. I guess this could be why CNN won’t report the story at all. The further they run from the story the more convinced I am that they know the truth. They know Obama would be impeached.
To: TigersEye
The marines in Libya did not have live ammo.
To: TigersEye
" Speculations can run rampant when the press refuses to do their job. "
How true that is....
Isn't that what the media tried to do with President Bush ? and ran with speculations and insinuations with glee ?
Another thing they can't do ?
This Administration can not make it turn out to be a rescue mission gone wrong when they kept saying that the demonstrations were all about some " FILM " that offended Muslims around the world.... yes, read that again ( Muslim demonstrations around the world ) and Obama denounced the so called " FILM " that offended the Muslims at the UN.... in other words, that lie won't work.
To: Ohiobelle
Yes, I'm sure they did. They were not attached to the State Dept. they flew in from a ship in the Mediterranean. Thus the helicopters. If you have info to the contrary I'd love to see your source but this is from the original article...
"As I was dragging the wounded Marine to safety, some Marines who were located on the roof of the villa as snipers shouted and the rest of the Marines all hit the ground."
You don't station snipers if they have no ammo.
32
posted on
09/30/2012 12:30:46 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: gulf1609
But, but, but, you mean ? it wasn't because of some so called " FILM " that offended the Muslims ? rather it was ( now their story is ) that it was a attempted rescue mission ?
But, but, but, but, we were told that it was a " Spontaneous demonstration " because of that " FILM " that offended the Muslims, and Mr. Obama even denounced that " FILM " at the UN in front of the whole world.
To: American Constitutionalist
I'm still of the opinion this was a set up by the Obama administration to make it appear as if the republicans had made a deal with the terrorist to take embassy staff hostage and create a repeat of Jimmy Carter and the BS “October Surprise” the dems used against Reagan.
The dems embracing Carter at their convention then then a few weeks later you have Carter II is more than just a coincidence IMO>
34
posted on
09/30/2012 12:58:39 PM PDT
by
IMR 4350
To: RoosterRedux
35
posted on
09/30/2012 1:17:45 PM PDT
by
PLD
To: TigersEye
Yea, I know for a fact that the marines in Libya didn’t have live ammo. Maybe the marines that they say came in after the attack had ammo but not the marines stationed in Libya.
To: TigersEye
I can assure you I was never referring to the US Embassy in Egypt. I don’t know enough about that Embassy to even discuss it.
To: Ohiobelle
There were no Marines stationed in Benghazi, Libya or anywhere else in Libya.
38
posted on
09/30/2012 1:29:45 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
To: Diogenesis
...also Congress adjourned early
39
posted on
09/30/2012 1:35:05 PM PDT
by
opentalk
To: TomGuy
40
posted on
09/30/2012 1:36:28 PM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(When Chuck Norris goes to bed, he checks under it for Clint Eastwood!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson