To: onyx
Well that’s just hilarious. 90 seconds...really?
And you were too kind w/ the pic of Frankie. He’s not looked that good in decades.
Re: Willard and the debates...Willard should do fine in the debates if he sticks to a simple, concise message and doesn’t trip over his own feet.
But for the love of Pete...surely the American public will give Willard longer than 90 seconds.
13 posted on
09/26/2012 2:20:31 PM PDT by
conservaKate
(My vote will be against the One...not FOR Mittens.)
To: conservaKate
And you were too kind w/ the pic of Frankie. Hes not looked that good in decades.In that pic he looks like the head of a 1950s high school glee club.
18 posted on
09/26/2012 2:44:38 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
To: conservaKate
Aren't there 3 debates?
Fatso talks out of both side of his blubbery mouth. It's too late now , 5 weeks out, for Romney commercials to do any good but Obama was able to turn things around in 3 weeks.
24 posted on
09/26/2012 3:00:58 PM PDT by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: conservaKate; vbmoneyspender; Pharmboy
He’s so full of himself.
Romney has 90 seconds to win the debate and the presidency?
Oh my.
I’m wondering if Hannity is going to question him on this or just leave the attention whore alone?
Hannity really should slam him about his idiot statements. That cBS/NYT poll is fabricated. Otherwise, the Marxist would not be campaigning at Bowling Green and Kent State Universities.
He needs the dumb student vote along with thugs unions and blacks in Ohio.
36 posted on
09/26/2012 4:11:35 PM PDT by
onyx
(FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson