Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

If they aren’t profitable without government money put them under.


3 posted on 09/22/2012 7:17:18 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dalereed

“If they aren’t profitable without government money put them under.”

Yeah, who needs a main battle tank anyway?


6 posted on 09/22/2012 7:20:54 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans. Don't read their lips. Watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dalereed

so, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, every defense contractor in the country, put them under.
I guess you have lost your mind.


24 posted on 09/22/2012 8:00:20 AM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dalereed

“If they aren’t profitable without government money put them under.”

Do you realize just how ridiculous your statement is? Take a look at the list! Most of the companies are in the Healthcare business, the rest are military hardware contractors. Just how would you propose that these specialized businesses “diversify?”


39 posted on 09/22/2012 9:31:04 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson