Good point.
The LAT, supposedly an unbiased purveyor of information, officially and publicly endorsed Obama in 2008 (and in violation of their own policy) only to hide a video that may very well sink Obama’s candidacy—
The LAT crossed the line by endorsing Bama, they have waived their right to stand on the “publisher/source”
priviledge.
File suit to compel disclosure.
Newspapers endorse candidates all the time. LAT doesn’t? (I don’t read the paper, so I really don’t know.)