Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: acapesket
“By the way, you are correct, I don’t eat any of the foods that you mentioned, nor does my family.
We eat tasty food that is not intentionally chemically treated.”

None of the substances I listed are the result of any chemical treatment, in fact they are all “naturally” found in those foods and that would include the “organic” brands.

“What is so awful about “labelling”?”

Nothing at all. The foods you eat should have warning labels about possible carcinogens in them.

As for debunking the world has enough bunk in it that losing a little bit of it won't hurt anyone except the bunkers. FR is useful to that end.

118 posted on 09/20/2012 5:37:35 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: count-your-change

Once again, you misunderstand.

“intentionally chemically treated”

You clearly misunderstand the difference between naturally occuring compounds and chemicals, and no indeed they are not found so much in non GMO foods.

There is a difference between non GMO and organic, so I try and stick with both for my family’s health.

Can we just agree to disagree? Or are you one of those swarthy males who always has to “win”?


119 posted on 09/20/2012 6:33:20 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson