Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dry-run experiments verify key aspect of Sandia nuclear fusion concept
Sandia National Lab ^ | 09/17/12 | Sandia National Lab

Posted on 09/19/2012 10:14:10 AM PDT by Moonman62

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
This is actually nuclear weapons research, but if it works for energy production, so much the better.
1 posted on 09/19/2012 10:14:20 AM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
This must be what Iran is really working on .... /s
2 posted on 09/19/2012 10:22:29 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Too late. Cold fusion machines are now working everywhere. /s


3 posted on 09/19/2012 10:27:26 AM PDT by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

energy too cheap to meter..


4 posted on 09/19/2012 10:41:06 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Z-pinch is interesting, but like the NIF's laser fusion, this is a "putt-putt" motor, not a continuous reaction. Still, Z-pinch might end up being the first commercially-viable hot fusion.

So-called "cold fusion" (really Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions or LENR) has promise, too, but probably will not scale very well.

5 posted on 09/19/2012 10:45:56 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (My game is disruption. I will use lethal force --my vote-- in self-defense against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
crushed by the large magnetic fields of the 25-million-ampere Z machine, would yield slightly more energy than is inserted into it.

Don't get too excited about this. Even if it works (REAL TEST in 2013) slightly better than break even energy isn't enough, You have to take into account the thermodynamics of converting heat into electricity which runs at about 33% in a thermal power plant, so you have to generate about three times the energy required to initiate the fusion just to break even on the electric bill. I've been keep up with the literature on fusion energy generation since the middle 60's and the breakthrough has always been just around the corner.

6 posted on 09/19/2012 10:46:05 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Reusablity seems to be what Sandia was missing.
Previously they used Tungsten threads instead of Be cylinders. The Tungsten was vaporized on each firing.

In theory with multiple reactors, it would run like a very large pulse reactor, one firing while the rest were re-loaded.

Very interesting!


7 posted on 09/19/2012 10:48:03 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Now when my 8-year-old son asks what a “MILF” is, I can tell him “Magnetized Inertial Linear Fusion.”


8 posted on 09/19/2012 10:50:00 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“This is actually nuclear weapons research, but if it works for energy production, so much the better.”

Yes, of course. Under pressure to cite/publish muslim success stories so that even Freepers will be excited......


9 posted on 09/19/2012 10:50:17 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZX12R
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann demonstrated cold fusion in '89...but, alas...

... they were not in the right discipline...

..they were mere ignorant & lowly PhD Chemists....not more superior PhD Physicists....

...how in the world could a chemist possibly be smart enough to do the cyphering that it takes to even know what a fusion reaction looks like?

10 posted on 09/19/2012 10:52:49 AM PDT by B.O. Plenty (Elections have consequences....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“You didn’t build that”


11 posted on 09/19/2012 10:58:34 AM PDT by printhead (Standard & Poor - Poor is the new standard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B.O. Plenty
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann demonstrated cold fusion in '89

Uh huh. Suuuuuuuurrrrre they did.
12 posted on 09/19/2012 11:00:11 AM PDT by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Don't get too excited about this. Even if it works (REAL TEST in 2013) slightly better than break even energy isn't enough,

They are claiming that 1000 times input energy is technically feasible.

You have to take into account the thermodynamics of converting heat into electricity which runs at about 33% in a thermal power plant, so you have to generate about three times the energy required to initiate the fusion just to break even on the electric bill.

I've frequently seen 10 times as the multiple for making money.

13 posted on 09/19/2012 11:02:03 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Now when my 8-year-old son asks what a “MILF” is, I can tell him “Magnetized Inertial Linear Fusion.”

LOL! I'd have to write it on a slip of paper to remember it, though.

14 posted on 09/19/2012 11:05:23 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I've frequently seen 10 times as the multiple for making money.

Sounds about right

They are claiming that 1000 times input energy is technically feasible.

Cynicism is always called for when reading about fusion energy claims.

15 posted on 09/19/2012 11:12:48 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

And one thing I forgot to mention, Tritium is considerably easier (but still not easy) to fuse than deuterium, but results in a much dirtier fusion reaction. Tritium fusion produces copious quantities of neutrons which then transmute most of the surrounding structure into radioactive isotopes of the original material.


16 posted on 09/19/2012 11:16:31 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Absolutely. And they still have the big test in 2013. I find that skepticism is called for in response to all scientific press releases.


17 posted on 09/19/2012 11:17:37 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I don’t think so. They are trying to duplicate what happens in a Teller-Ulam thermonuclear device, without the fission (a-bomb) trigger... We can already do this sort of reaction, just not real controlled and at this small scale...


18 posted on 09/19/2012 11:25:52 AM PDT by LaRueLaDue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

My understanding was that, under the Emperor’s green-energy dictates, they were going to use a wind-farm output to trigger the actual fusion process.


19 posted on 09/19/2012 2:26:43 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
...I've been keep up with the literature on fusion energy generation since the middle 60's and the breakthrough has always been just around the corner 20 years in the future.

I didn't start following fusion until the 70's.

20 posted on 09/19/2012 3:11:50 PM PDT by DrDavid (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson