Skip to comments.
Dry-run experiments verify key aspect of Sandia nuclear fusion concept
Sandia National Lab ^
| 09/17/12
| Sandia National Lab
Posted on 09/19/2012 10:14:10 AM PDT by Moonman62
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
This is actually nuclear weapons research, but if it works for energy production, so much the better.
1
posted on
09/19/2012 10:14:20 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
To: Moonman62
This must be what Iran is really working on .... /s
2
posted on
09/19/2012 10:22:29 AM PDT
by
Ken522
To: Moonman62
Too late. Cold fusion machines are now working everywhere. /s
3
posted on
09/19/2012 10:27:26 AM PDT
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
To: Moonman62
energy too cheap to meter..
To: Moonman62
Z-pinch is interesting, but like the NIF's laser fusion, this is a "putt-putt" motor, not a continuous reaction. Still, Z-pinch might end up being the first commercially-viable hot fusion.
So-called "cold fusion" (really Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions or LENR) has promise, too, but probably will not scale very well.
5
posted on
09/19/2012 10:45:56 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(My game is disruption. I will use lethal force --my vote-- in self-defense against Obama.)
To: Moonman62
crushed by the large magnetic fields of the 25-million-ampere Z machine, would yield slightly more energy than is inserted into it. Don't get too excited about this. Even if it works (REAL TEST in 2013) slightly better than break even energy isn't enough, You have to take into account the thermodynamics of converting heat into electricity which runs at about 33% in a thermal power plant, so you have to generate about three times the energy required to initiate the fusion just to break even on the electric bill. I've been keep up with the literature on fusion energy generation since the middle 60's and the breakthrough has always been just around the corner.
6
posted on
09/19/2012 10:46:05 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: Moonman62
Reusablity seems to be what Sandia was missing.
Previously they used Tungsten threads instead of Be cylinders. The Tungsten was vaporized on each firing.
In theory with multiple reactors, it would run like a very large pulse reactor, one firing while the rest were re-loaded.
Very interesting!
7
posted on
09/19/2012 10:48:03 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: Moonman62
Now when my 8-year-old son asks what a “MILF” is, I can tell him “Magnetized Inertial Linear Fusion.”
8
posted on
09/19/2012 10:50:00 AM PDT
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: Moonman62
“This is actually nuclear weapons research, but if it works for energy production, so much the better.”
Yes, of course. Under pressure to cite/publish muslim success stories so that even Freepers will be excited......
9
posted on
09/19/2012 10:50:17 AM PDT
by
treetopsandroofs
(Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
To: ZX12R
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann demonstrated cold fusion in '89...but, alas...
... they were not in the right discipline...
..they were mere ignorant & lowly PhD Chemists....not more superior PhD Physicists....
...how in the world could a chemist possibly be smart enough to do the cyphering that it takes to even know what a fusion reaction looks like?
10
posted on
09/19/2012 10:52:49 AM PDT
by
B.O. Plenty
(Elections have consequences....)
To: Moonman62
11
posted on
09/19/2012 10:58:34 AM PDT
by
printhead
(Standard & Poor - Poor is the new standard.)
To: B.O. Plenty
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann demonstrated cold fusion in '89
Uh huh. Suuuuuuuurrrrre they did.
12
posted on
09/19/2012 11:00:11 AM PDT
by
ZX12R
(FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
To: from occupied ga
Don't get too excited about this. Even if it works (REAL TEST in 2013) slightly better than break even energy isn't enough, They are claiming that 1000 times input energy is technically feasible.
You have to take into account the thermodynamics of converting heat into electricity which runs at about 33% in a thermal power plant, so you have to generate about three times the energy required to initiate the fusion just to break even on the electric bill.
I've frequently seen 10 times as the multiple for making money.
13
posted on
09/19/2012 11:02:03 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: mvpel
Now when my 8-year-old son asks what a MILF is, I can tell him Magnetized Inertial Linear Fusion. LOL! I'd have to write it on a slip of paper to remember it, though.
14
posted on
09/19/2012 11:05:23 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
I've frequently seen 10 times as the multiple for making money. Sounds about right
They are claiming that 1000 times input energy is technically feasible.
Cynicism is always called for when reading about fusion energy claims.
15
posted on
09/19/2012 11:12:48 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: Moonman62
And one thing I forgot to mention, Tritium is considerably easier (but still not easy) to fuse than deuterium, but results in a much dirtier fusion reaction. Tritium fusion produces copious quantities of neutrons which then transmute most of the surrounding structure into radioactive isotopes of the original material.
16
posted on
09/19/2012 11:16:31 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: from occupied ga
Absolutely. And they still have the big test in 2013. I find that skepticism is called for in response to all scientific press releases.
17
posted on
09/19/2012 11:17:37 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Moonman62
I don’t think so. They are trying to duplicate what happens in a Teller-Ulam thermonuclear device, without the fission (a-bomb) trigger... We can already do this sort of reaction, just not real controlled and at this small scale...
To: Moonman62
My understanding was that, under the Emperor’s green-energy dictates, they were going to use a wind-farm output to trigger the actual fusion process.
19
posted on
09/19/2012 2:26:43 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: from occupied ga
...
I've been keep up with the literature on fusion energy generation since the middle 60's and the breakthrough has always been just around the corner 20 years in the future. I didn't start following fusion until the 70's.
20
posted on
09/19/2012 3:11:50 PM PDT
by
DrDavid
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson