Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart
Because diplomatically speaking, sending a gay man to an area that murders them is stupid foreign policy. Say nothing of asking for an international incident by shoving it in their faces.

France or the UK? Fine. They don’t kill gays for their sex lives. Koranimals do.

By your logic, we should only send Muslim ambassadors to Muslim countries, since Muslims have a habit of persecuting Christians in their countries. Obviously, if this guy was flaunting his homosexuality, then that would obviously be stupid foreign policy. But, simply sending someone who happens to be gay (if, in fact, he actually is - seems like a rumor to me, at this point) does not seem to be relevant, diplomatically speaking.

322 posted on 09/15/2012 5:05:23 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

My point is that you do not intentionally add fuel to a fire.. It is a fact that homosexuals hold a special place in the hatred of the muslim world. It is a fact that muslims consider women to be less than men.

It is therefore stupid and poor diplomacy to send such as representatives if we send anyone at all.

As I stated earlier, my preference is pull out, take our money with us and nuke them if they interfere/attack us or our interests.

If you HAVE to play, play to win. And stacking the deck against yourself is idiocy.


326 posted on 09/15/2012 5:12:38 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson