I’m not interested in nitpicking with you. I was specifically stating that only a couple of people claimed that his body (alive or dead) was sodomized specifically because he was a homosexual.
Neither Norm nor I made that claim.
But you chose to reply to me when I was refuting that logic. You also claimed that the article wasn't about that when it clearly is.
Of course, they’ve all been talking about Ambassador Stevens’ murder by Muslims in Libya: and all of them are incredulous that the State Department sent a gay man to be ambassador to a Muslim country. News reports continue to indicate that the Muslims who murdered Stevens also raped him repeatedly, before and after his death.
The point that statement is making is obvious and saying only two posters are supporting that is a laugh.