Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
If we really believe there is no difference at all between them, then so be it. But if we think that a Romney presidency would be at least somewhat less destructive than four more years of Obama, then you've got to recognize that it will come down to turnout. These articles are meant to suppress turnout for Romney. They work.
80 posted on 09/09/2012 8:28:20 AM PDT by outofstyle (Down All the Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: outofstyle

Sorry it is Romney’s position, his tactics that are going to suppress turn-out. Not a stupid article.

Look at the track record.

They enter the convention fully unified and the establishment just couldn’t resist they make a power play and fracture the unified front.

Now Romney has the nomination locked more truth comes out.

First it was repeal Obamacare
Then it was replace and replacement Obamacare
Now it is replace with Romneycare.

Now we all know why SCOTUS did what it did. They met with the Romney camp and had to preserve the approach because it would have restored power back to the US Constitution and no progressive can allow that.

Get ready for Amnesty as well.


82 posted on 09/09/2012 8:31:49 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson