Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper

Yeah well, gazillions of years is the time frame the gradualists would have us think in. Just consider it as whatever length of time it takes to support the unsupportable inconsistencies of their theory. Sorry; if there was another point there I missed it.


58 posted on 09/06/2012 11:20:01 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake
I can tell I'm going to regret showing up here, it's one of THOSE topics...

but you might enjoy this little example of a mountain building theory (I like)

MOUNTAIN BUILDING VIDEO

And, as an afterthought -

My favourite mountain in Spitzbergen.

59 posted on 09/06/2012 11:38:33 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: ForGod'sSake
Actually they wouldn't. Geology has a well defined time-line and there is no mention of “gazillions” (I have a feeling you know that). Geology also happens to be a rather robust science that has presented mankind with access to a wide range of resources, and that access is a direct consequence of the very supportable consistencies within geologic theory. Sorry, but I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.
61 posted on 09/06/2012 11:54:39 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson