Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kartographer

The trouble with looking at a single facet of American Agribusiness is that it will invariably look bizarre, and this is the case here.

W. Bush is somewhat to blame for the idea of centralizing food production and distribution. He was very big into the idea of a North American Union, the Plan Pueblo Panama, FTAA, the trans-Texas corridor, and other such nonsensical pipe dream indulgences.

However, that being said, all the second link did was to assert that one part of the system had been bled dry. And this is accurate. But that does not mean that the same has happened to its parallel systems.

(And truthfully, he killed his credibility at the end by saying, “As for bio-terrorism……considering we have more than 700 bio-weapons labs cris-crossing the country, its pretty safe to say that should we have a bio weapon attack, it will probably originate from a city near you.”)

Bottom line: Right now, almost 40% of our corn crop goes to ethanol.

The USDA site also says that 4.1% of U.S. corn (2008) goes for high fructose corn syrup. That means that since 29.9% of all U.S. cropland harvested was planted in corn in 2007, 1.2% of all U.S. cropland harvested in 2007 went for high fructose corn syrup. That’s only slightly less than the 1.5% of U.S. cropland devoted to vegetables or the 1.6% of U.S. cropland devoted to [fruit] orchards.

All the US has to do is stop converting corn into ethanol, and in short order, we are up to our eyebrows in corn.


197 posted on 09/04/2012 11:55:23 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"But that does not mean that the same has happened to its parallel systems."

203 posted on 09/04/2012 12:08:51 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"But that does not mean that the same has happened to its parallel systems."

But it doesn't mean that it's parallel systems are teeming either. Also those parallel systems are pretty much in private hands, which means what's in them have just as much or possibly more of being sold to China rather then to feed Americans. When strip out one system, combine it with massive sales to other countries and a drought you are head for trouble. I like to see figures that show these parallel systems having the capacity to make up for the lack of of CCC strategic.

Besides this is all not on subject. My response was to your your claim that there was that there was this large CCC Strategic Grain Storage and the truth is there isn't any more.
205 posted on 09/04/2012 12:11:23 PM PDT by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson