To: CincyRichieRich
There is no such thing as the Bradley effect. It was disproven in 2008, big time. The polls were about right at the end.
That said, I think Gallup is closer in the disapproval than Ras. You simly can't have this kind of Romney lead and still have 48% job approval.
21 posted on
09/02/2012 2:13:01 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
To: LS
Most 2008 polls underestimated the McCain vote (8 of 10). Not by a huge amount, but the bias is there, and it appears to be nonrandom.
![](http://www.minnpost.com/sites/default/files/asset/9/9cc018/9cc018.jpg)
25 posted on
09/02/2012 2:43:34 PM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: LS
There is no such thing as the Bradley effect. It was disproven in 2008, big time. The polls were about right at the end.
That said, I think Gallup is closer in the disapproval than Ras. You simly can’t have this kind of Romney lead and still have 48% job approval.
So that said, then you are telling me there are no frustrated, angry republicans like me hanging up on pollsters and refusing to answer them, and, there are no replublicans or even moderates who are telling the pollsters what they want to hear to not look like they are anti-black? And, you are telling me there are because of these two things not oversampling of Dems? Call it something else then, all three of these things ARE going on. That is to our favor and what happened in 2010 as the Dems arrogantly thought the exit polls were right when they were wrong.
34 posted on
09/02/2012 5:43:04 PM PDT by
CincyRichieRich
(Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson