[Happy Rain]

That the Clint Eastwood speech was a useless “distraction” as already stated by the Leftists on the panel...

...you agree?

[celmak]

"That the Clint Eastwood speech was a useless “distraction” as already stated by the Leftists on the panel..."

That was not in the last ten minutes. Akin, abortion, Biden, Planned Parenthood, the Dem platform was the topic; and the topic of this post. If you want to detract from the post, go for it; but create your on post on the subject and then I'll give you an comment on Eastwood.

[RFEngineer]

“That the Clint Eastwood speech was a useless “distraction” as already stated by the Leftists on the panel...”

Hey, that is just subjective opinion. I liked Clint Eastwood, but some didn’t - I’m not sure what people who hold this opinion expected from Clint - a major policy speech?

Hardly treason though. It’ll just get the press to keep talking about Clint.

Newt was probably just jealous of Clint’s greater impact on the convention than his own.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

the Clint Eastwood speech was a useless “distraction”

I disagree with both you and Newt. It was a very useful distraction.