To: All
Segal said that, when considering the imperative to attack, Netanyahu and Barak reason that “we may have reached the moment of truth” after which it would be too late to stop Iran, and that “the price of an attack is far lower than the price of inaction.” It will be “a matter of a few months” before it is too late, Segal said — before, that is, Iran would be immune from damage by an Israeli strike.
The window to have an effective strike is closing rapidly!
2 posted on
09/01/2012 3:34:01 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
To: xzins
May God be with them. Unfortunately, we won’t.
4 posted on
09/01/2012 3:39:50 PM PDT by
bcsco
(Bourbon gets better with age...I age better with Bourbon.)
To: xzins
I think that Obama moved our carrier groups to the Persian Gulf, not to stop Iran, but to stop an Israeli attack on Iran.
To: xzins
Mid September, possibly the day after
Rosh HaShana...
To: xzins
It’s a stiff, steep challenge at best. Israelis have doubtless spied out a lot, but a lot could still be hiding under those sands. But still, if Israel hits, Saudi Arabia will privately be glad. They and Iran represent two opposite warring factions of Islam.
16 posted on
09/01/2012 4:00:56 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson