Would you think that George W. Bush does?
While he did not advertise it much, he pushed behind the scenes for a North American Free Trade Zone, roughly based on the European Common Market. This would eventually expand to all the Americas, the FTAA.
He also supported the Plan Puebla Panama, Mexican President Vincente Fox’s idea to depopulate southern Mexico (sending the people living there North in a massive illegal immigration invasion, which caused a huge surge in the number of illegals entering the US), and to turn southern Mexico into the North and central American shipping, air transport, and rail nexus, leading to a gigantic transport corridor bisecting the US to Canada. (The Texans fought that corridor to a standstill. And the rest of the PPP has pretty much ground to a halt. Only the ethnic cleansing part worked.)
And despite repeated and firm denials, Bush went so far as to support preliminary analysis of the creation of a unified currency, the Amero, which would replace the US and Canadian dollar and the Mexico New Peso.
Mind you, this was at a time when he pushed through the creation of America as police state, based on 9-11, with vast numbers of “anti-terrorism” laws that are *exclusively* used against Americans that have nothing to do with terrorism.
This is what “internationalism” offers us. So pardon me if I am apprehensive when a Republican goes to the Brookings Institution, a hive of anti-Americanism. I would be about as concerned if he had addressed the Communist Youth League, the Trilateral Commission, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, or other such collective of scoundrels.
If Marco Rubio has *any* internationalist leanings, it should disqualify him for elective office. Internationalists do no brag about their tendencies, they work hard for them behind the scenes, in impressive bipartisan conspiracies, none of which is for America’s benefit.
It does not matter if they tout internationalism’s “nice face”. It is still a bargain with the devil against our nation and our way of life.
If Marco Rubio has *any* internationalist leanings, it should disqualify him for elective office.
______________________________
According to your own definition...you have nothing to worry about in this regard with Senator Rubio.
Would you think that George W. Bush does?
_______________________________
The topic is Marco Rubio.