Replies

Same here. Mitt Romney likely lost the election tonight and it isn't going to matter one bit who he blames because losing is losing.

Oh horsesnot. You're so full of BS. You weren't going to vote for Romney and were are always predicting he'd lose anyway. You just look for any thread to post your debbie downer drivel.

Romney's odds of winning have actually been increasing in both polling, on intrade, etc. Willard has nearly drawn even with Hussein and it is increasingly possible that he will be elected president. Nothing that happened at the convention today changes this dynamic. And FYI, these rule changes were primarily designed at chasing the paulbots away. Perhaps they were overkill, but that was generally the intent. And I say good riddance. Paultards hate social conservatives and detest the traditional, family oriented wing of the Republican party. They weren't going to vote for our nominee no matter who it was (and there is no chance it was going to be Paul).

Longbow1969 wrote: "And FYI, these rule changes were primarily designed at chasing the paulbots away. Perhaps they were overkill, but that was generally the intent. And I say good riddance. Paultards hate social conservatives and detest the traditional, family oriented wing of the Republican party. They weren't going to vote for our nominee no matter who it was (and there is no chance it was going to be Paul)."

Good point, Longbow. I think you're right.