Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

I don’t know what the answer is because I have seen these “Paultards” in action at our state convention. Our delegation was seated right next to the biggest Pauler delegation in the state. It was being led by a woman with glassy eyes, who clapped and giggled every time one of her buddies succeeded in causing a delay in the convention. They are a scary bunch. The worst part is that they don’t seem to have any cohesive ideology, other than legalizing marijuana. I mean a lot of them in my county are actually members of government unions.

I am just trying to point out that it was the Paulers who planned and precipitated this rule change in order to divide the party. It’s been planned for months. I am more surprised that the conservatives were unprepared for it than anything else.


291 posted on 08/28/2012 1:40:29 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: Eva

So you’re saying that the Paulites proposed these rule changes to the Rules Committee? Is that what you’re saying?


317 posted on 08/28/2012 2:16:48 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson