To: Nachum
Hopefully some of the FR “tread heads” will post their opinions on what kind of threat is posed by the M-60A3,
5 posted on
08/26/2012 9:04:11 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: BenLurkin
I’m not a tread head, but I’m the son of one and have been paying attention for a long time.
Those M-60s would be so much scrap if the Israelis came to town.
10 posted on
08/26/2012 9:13:10 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: BenLurkin
Not sure why the M60 is much of a big deal, those are 1960s stuff.
Egypt has nearly 900 M1 Abrams in their fleet, 1980s stuff.
To: BenLurkin; archy; Gringo1; Matthew James; Fred Mertz; Squantos; colorado tanker; The Shrew; SLB; ...
Ben, here is a treadhead ping. I'm sure it hasn't been updated in a long time. I'll be curious to see how many names aren't valid when I test post.
Free Republic Treadhead Ping
18 posted on
08/26/2012 9:30:53 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: BenLurkin; The Shrew
Shrew is a former tanker ... Got any comments on the M60A3?
29 posted on
08/26/2012 10:40:41 AM PDT by
IronJack
(=)
To: BenLurkin
Hopefully some of the FR tread heads will post their opinions on what kind of threat is posed by the M-60A3, The M60A3 is much more reliable than the M1 series. Who would take a turbine engine and stick it into a tank that makes a dust storm every where it goes? I worked on many military series of trucks, tanks, personnel carriers, etc., and the M1 is a maintenance nightmare. Paper manuals for that thing take up about 100 feet of shelf space.
57 posted on
08/26/2012 2:14:24 PM PDT by
Arrowhead1952
(RINO season is open. No limit. Make them extinct.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson