You as an Iowan have no right to tell him what he has to do. That is up to the voters in MO and if they don’t want him they will not vote for him
But the huge hole in your rather shallow argument is that as a Senator from Missouri, Claire McCaskill can damned sure tell the poster from Iowa what to do - which at least reason number three that your line of argument here is rather pathetic.
Trust me, the voters in Missouri aren’t going to vote for him. Romney will carry the state by 7-8 points. I can see Akin losing by double digits.
Are you a Missourian?
This is the same dilemma we have with the RINOs who run in many states where a regular Republican wouldn't have a chance.
Sometimes we get a RINO and he gives us a ruling majority, and as long as we keep him out of party ideologically oriented affairs, that's usually OK if it's a real life and death difference.
However, I think the time of the RINO has disappeared. We must be prepared to run real Conservatives in every race even if some in the GOP-e don't think so, AND we have to be prepared to NOT run a Conservative who is doomed to lose ~ particularly when we have Conservatives of equal or greater quality waiting in the wings.
Give you an example, we are facing the mind-numbed robot-like knee-jerk Leftwingtard of the century, and he's a very stupid man to boot. We do not need to run a RINO against him to win. We certainly don't need to run someone who could be easily mistaen for him when it comes to oppressive policies and methods.
So why did we stick with the GOP-e when they decided they need a faux Democrat to beat Obama?
Clearly this is the year for some new departures.