Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Same reason too ~ guy was a Republican office holder and donated to Democrats. That sort of thing should be the end of one's career. This Akin guy did not object to Democrat funded ads on his behalf.

If the GOP-e wants to keep a place in the Republican party they'll have to start showing some brand name discipline or they'll lose everything ~ the party, the important factions, all the voters, the candidates.

12 losers in the last 70 years is 12 too many! We've only had 6 winners in that time under their authority! Then there's the 'me to ism' ~ just too much of that ~ gives the show away to the Democrats. Romney has already started to speak well of RombamakKKare ~ and that is certainly only the first of a wave of 'me to ism's. Democrats love that stuff ~ they know they can run a stuffed dog for office and beat a Republican who does that.

29 posted on 08/26/2012 5:29:52 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah; P-Marlowe
This Akin guy did not object to Democrat funded ads on his behalf.
And if he had objected what do you honestly think the reply to his objection would have been?

Surely you can "figure it out", can't you?
You keep positing it and I'll keep asking it.

And what do you think about the comments by McCaskill in the article I pinged you to last night from Aug 8, 2012 well before all of this started?

Doesn't it sound to you like she intended to damage him instead of help him?

32 posted on 08/26/2012 5:42:59 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson