Yes, I absolutely agree with your post.
In my mind, the original crime in the scenario of impregnation by way of rape is that the male proceeded with obtaining the consent of the female.
The situation cannot be corrected without obtaining that consent.
What needs to be done is that we must go back and ask her how to proceed, thus it is her choice and it always was her choice, sadly the act of rape denied that choice.
Certainly, if she decided to proceed with the pregnancy and either raise the baby or put the baby up for adoption, then that is the best solution in my mind.
If she decides not to do that, however, then I do support that decision. I will neither judge her, nor condemn her, but I will judge and condemn the rapist, and I will support the female victim.
I cannot and will not under any circumstance be party to compounding the original crime by further denying the victim her consent.
You have shown more sense and compassion on this thread than your opponents.
I am against abortion for convenience, but rape is a completely different scenario. I’m amazed that so many people can’t see the difference.
If the woman is can endure the pregnancy and raise the child or put it up for adoption that would be the best situation.
But forcing that situation on the victim of a brutal crime is also evil and will cause her further injury. To deny this is being willfully stupid.
What about the “consent” of the other innocent victim, the baby conceived?
Your position is sophistry in any orthodox Judeo-Christian analysis.
But in a post Christian culture, among posters who are propagandized to the point of eclipse of reason, yours is seen by some as laudatory.
May god have Mercy on us all for our hubris. .