Your analysis is correct ~ 60% of the Conservatives voted for someone else in the primaries. Many Democrats crossed over and voted for Akin. McCaskill campaigned for him. Democrats gave him campaign funds.
There are some real fundamental questions here regarding Akin's legitimacy ~ and then he turned immediately to Leftwingtard commenters to deliver his first big interview.
I don't think I"d vote for him either.
Well, believe you me, Missourians are heck-a pissed at Obama. Yet, the latest Rasmussen polls have Obama showing a slight lead in Missouri. These are the same Rasmussen polls which show Akin way down after his legitimate rape comment.
It is obvious to many of us in Missouri that the Rasmussen polls have been skewed.
Since I trust Rasmussen more than any other pollster, the only other reasonable explanation is that those who were polled lied to the Rasmussen pollsters to A) Try to pressure Akin off the ticket so that one of the other two Primary Candidates could have a Mulligan, and B) Akin supporters lied about voting for Obama in order to spit in the face of the GOP establishment which has hung Akin out to dry.
Furthermore, I think you have been misled about Missouri voters.
I’ve watched every single election in Missouri for almost 50 years. When Conservative Missourians get peeved, they go out and vote in droves!
Because of Obama, they will be out in full force come November. Do you really think they are going to leave the Akin/McCaskill box unchecked?
Hell no!
Just my two-cents. Take it for what it’s worth.
Cheers
Come on, now...surely you can "figure out" what she might have said, can't you?
I mean, you've "figured out" what you think Akin should have done so it's not like it's a great leap to "figure out" what she might have said, is it?